Effectiveness of Three Turbulence Modeling Approaches in a Crosswind–Sedan–Dune Computational Fluid Dynamics Framework

Author:

Yang Weichao12,Wang Jian1,Dong Yue34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

2. National Engineering Research Center of High-Speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha 410075, China

3. National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Center (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong, China

4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Abstract

The aerodynamic loads of a sedan experience significant fluctuations when passing by a sand dune at the roadside under crosswinds, which can easily cause yawing and overturning. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, based on different turbulence modeling approaches, yield different aerodynamic results for sedans. This study aims to investigate the effects of three prevailing turbulence modeling approaches (renormalization group (RNG) k-ε, large eddy simulation (LES), and improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES)) on the aerodynamic characteristics of a sedan passing by a sand dune under crosswinds. The CFD dynamic mesh models are constructed using the “mosaic” mesh technique to account for the dune–air–sedan interaction. The reliability of the CFD prediction method is verified by comparing it with field test results. The predictive capabilities of the three turbulence modeling approaches are compared in terms of aerodynamic loads and flow field characteristics. The simulation of sand particle movement is conducted through the discrete phase model, aiming to assess the impact of wind–sand flow on the aerodynamic properties of sedans. Corresponding results show that the aerodynamic loads predicted by the LES model closely match (within 4.4–7.5%) the corresponding data obtained from field tests. While the IDDES and LES models demonstrate similar abilities in characterizing the wind field details, and their results exhibit maximum differences of 8.3–15.7%. Meanwhile, the maximum difference between the results obtained by the RNG k-ε and LES models ranges from 14.8% to 18.4%, attributed to its inability to capture subtle changes in the vortex structure within the flow field. This work will provide a numerical modeling reference for studies on the wind–sand flow and the aerodynamic characteristics of sedans running through the desert, and it has implications for the safe driving of sedans under extreme conditions.

Funder

Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway

Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway group limited

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. The physics of wind erosion and its control;Chepil;Adv. Agron.,1963

2. On the crescentic shape of barchan dunes;Hersen;Eur. Phys. J. B,2004

3. Long-time evolution of models of aeolian sand dune fields: Influence of dune formation and collision;Diniega;Geomorphology,2010

4. Force distribution within a barchan dune;Alvarez;Phys. Fluids,2021

5. Transiting test method for galloping of iced conductor using wind generated by a moving vehicle;Guo;Wind. Struct.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3