Understanding the User Experience of Lumbar-Support-Assistive Devices in Lower-Back Pain Patients: Design Recommendations

Author:

Chen Zibin1ORCID,Zhang Meng1ORCID,Zhang Xi2ORCID,Liu Chenyang3ORCID,Wang Huize4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Design, ERICA Campus, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea

2. School of Art and Design, Chang Zhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213000, China

3. Academy of Arts & Design, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

4. Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China

Abstract

A positive user experience is crucial for enhancing user adherence throughout the utilization of lumbar-support-assistive devices (LSAD). However, there is a lack of research for optimal user experience with LSAD in the existing literature. Therefore, this study aims to explore how patients with lower-back pain use LSAD and assess their satisfaction and overall experience. Based on this, we aim to provide design improvement recommendations for LSAD to researchers in the relevant field. Through in-depth interviews with 14 LSAD users, key themes were identified using reflexive thematic analysis. The results indicate that participants were “somewhat satisfied” with the overall experience with their LSAD. The key factors influencing the LSAD-wearing experience were: (1) key design challenges in improving LSAD (stability, fit and, comfort), (2) providing necessary assistance (potential barriers and prompts), and (3) individualizing needs and balance of design (aesthetics, dimensions, safety, and cleanliness). All participants reported that poor stability, fit, and comfort of LSAD were the main reasons for an adverse experience. It is worth noting that users may encounter potential barriers when initially using LSAD. Furthermore, younger participants perceived pressure related to appearance and expressed concerns about the exposure of their health privacy during social interactions involving the LSAD. Based on these findings, we have proposed a set of comprehensive LSAD design-improvement recommendations, which serve as a foundational reference for future improvements.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3