Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Social Communication-Journalism, School of Social Sciences, Pontifical Bolivarian University, Medellín 050001, Colombia
2. Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontifical Bolivarian University, Medellín 050001, Colombia
3. John Fredy Moreno Sarta, Contractor Pontifical Bolivarian University, Medellín 050001, Colombia
4. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Agroindustria, Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira, Pereira 660003, Colombia
Abstract
This article examines the diagnosis of the Agricultural Innovation System (SIA) in the department of Tolima, Colombia, as part of a project led by the Colombian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Technological University of Pereira (TUP), which also evaluated the National Agricultural Innovation System (NAIS) in regions such as Chocó, Bolívar, and Meta. A methodology was used that involved a survey with 58 questions on a Likert scale with 300 participants, evaluated with congruence and relevance indexes, identifying key variables in the operation of the Agricultural Innovation System (AIS). A survey was applied to map actors in the National Innovation System for Higher Education in Agriculture, as well as the participating actors in the regional agricultural innovation systems of Tolima to identify gaps in extension, innovation, development, sustainability, information technology (TI), education, and training. Among the conclusions, it stands out that the associativity subsystem presents the lowest performance and is close to a score of two on the scale of gaps. An evaluation was carried out among the five subsystems, including extension, TI, environmental aspects, and public policy. The department of Tolima shows low performance in innovation and TI, while their extension performance is less weak. In Chaparral, there is a general lag, with innovation being the worst evaluated subsystem. Rovira obtains high scores in most subsystems, although innovation and TI have lower scores. At the national and regional levels, innovation is low, and communication among the NARS actors is insufficient, which highlights the need to promote good practices, strategies, and projects.
Funder
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Colombia
Reference51 articles.
1. Plataforma de Agricultura Tropical (2024, January 01). Marco Común sobre el Desarrollo de Capacidades para los Sistemas de Innovación Agrícola: Antecedentes Conceptuales. CAB Internacional, Wallingford, Reino Unido. Available online: http://www.fao.org/in-action/tropical-agriculture-platform/commonframework/es/.
2. Organización para la Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico (2024, January 01). Sistemas de Innovación Agrícola: Un Marco Para Analizar el Papel del Gobierno. Publicaciones de la OCDE. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/publications/agricultural-innovation-systems-9789264200593-en.htm.
3. Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: A return to the classical political economy;Manioudis;New Political Econ.,2022
4. The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues;Klarin;Zagreb Int. Rev. Econ. Bus.,2018
5. Metodología “Arreglos y Sistemas Productivos Innovativos Locales” en municipios cubanos;Retos De La Dir.,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献