Abstract
Climate change is negatively affecting agricultural production in the Sahel region. Climate-Smart Agricultural Technologies (CSATs) are disseminated to reduce these negative effects, and particularly those on resource-poor farm households. This article investigates the distributional impacts of the adoption of CSAT on-farm households’ welfare using a dataset that covers four regions, 32 communes, 320 villages, and 2240 households in Mali. Using an instrumental variable quantile treatment effects model, the paper addresses the potential endogeneity arising from the selection bias and the heterogeneity of the effect across the quantiles of the outcome variables’ distribution. The results show that the adoption of CSAT is positively associated with improved households’ welfare. The farmers’ decision to adopt any CSAT is influenced by access to credit, contact with extension agents, participation in training, access to information through the television, and being a member of any organization such as a cooperative society. Moreover, the effect of the adoption of CSAT on household welfare varies across the different households. In particular, the results show that the impact of the adoption of CSAT on households’ welfare is generally higher for the poorest (farmers located at the bottom tail of the distribution) end of the welfare distribution. The findings, therefore, highlight the pro-poor impact of the adoption of CSAT in the rural Malian context, as well as the need to tailor the CSAT interventions toward specific socio-economic segments of the rural population in Mali.
Funder
Royal Norwegian Embassy in Mali
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science
Reference88 articles.
1. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). A Report on World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results, 2022.
2. Silva, G. Feeding the World in 2050 and beyond–Part 1: Productivity Challenges. In Michigan State University Extension-December 3. 2022.
3. Global demand for food is rising. Can we meet it;Elferink;Harv. Bus. Rev.,2016
4. Economic growth, convergence, and world food demand and supply;Fukase;World Dev.,2020
5. Two Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green Revolution;Gollin;J. Political Econ.,2021
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献