Economic Evaluation of Nitrogen Fertilization Levels in Beef Cattle Production: Implications for Sustainable Tropical Pasture Management
-
Published:2023-12-02
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:2233
-
ISSN:2077-0472
-
Container-title:Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Agriculture
Author:
Souza William Luiz de1ORCID, Romanzini Eliéder Prates23ORCID, Delevatti Lutti Maneck1, Leite Rhaony Gonçalves1, Bernardes Priscila Arrigucci24ORCID, Cardoso Abmael da Silva5ORCID, Reis Ricardo Andrade1ORCID, Malheiros Euclides Braga1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil 2. Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia 3. DIT AgTech, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia 4. Department of Animal Science and Rural Development, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Road, 1346, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil 5. Range Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona, FL 33865, USA
Abstract
Understanding economic scenarios is crucial in all production chains. Tropical pastures are Brazil’s primary food source for beef cattle production, and current pasture management is not ideal due to land degradation. An economic evaluation assists farmers with improving pasture management using novel techniques, such as nitrogen (N) fertilization, which is straightforward and practical. The economic effects of different N fertilizer levels in beef cattle production were evaluated. This study was conducted over three years (2014/2015, 2015/2016, and 2016/2017) using four concentrations of urea fertilizer (0, 90, 180, and 270 kg N/ha). A principal component analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed using financial data. A financial pattern was observed, with increases in some variables, such as cost-effective operating and cost-total operating from those measuring costs and gross revenue, operating profit, and net income from those estimating revenues. Treatment with 180 kg N/ha fertilizer resulted in increased profitability, payback, internal rate of return, and net present value (at 6% and 12% tax) of 17.76%, 2.79 years, 35.79%, and USD 5926.03 and USD 1854.35, respectively. For this study, the main costs associated with profitability were supplementation, animal purchases, and sale prices. The best treatment to achieve excellent grazing pressure in tropical areas with oxisol is 180 kg/ha per year.
Funder
São Paulo Research Foundation Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science
Reference34 articles.
1. (2023, August 05). Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carne-ABIEC, 2021. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil–Relatório Anual 2021. Available online: http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/. 2. Cucinotta, D., and Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed., 91. 3. Hashem, N.M., Hassanein, E.M., Hocquette, J.-F., Gonzalez-Bulnes, A., Ahmed, F.A., Attia, Y.A., and Asiry, K.A. (2021). Agro-Livestock Farming System Sustainability during the COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of Information and Communication Technologies. Sustainability, 13. 4. Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 on Animal welfare and dairy farming in central Punjab, Pakistan;Hussain;Front. Vet. Sci.,2020 5. Effects of feeding system and slaughter age on tropical-breed steers’ growth and carcass characteristics;Agastin;J. Anim. Sci.,2013
|
|