Management of Rust in Wheat Using IPM Principles and Alternative Products

Author:

Jørgensen Lise Nistrup1,Matzen Niels1,Leitzke Rebekka1,Thomas Jane E.2,O’Driscoll Aoife2,Klocke Bettina3,Maumene Claude4,Lindell Ida5,Wahlquist Kerstin5,Zemeca Līga6,Apesteguia Marcos Barberena7,Randazzo Biango8,Slikova Svetlana9ORCID,Holdgate Sarah10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark

2. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK

3. Julius Kühn Institute, 14532 Kleinmachnow, Germany

4. Arvalis Institut du Végétal, 91720 Boigneville, France

5. HIR Skåne, 237 91 Bjärred, Sweden

6. Institute for Plant Protection Research, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia

7. The Institute for Agrifood Technology and Infrastructures, 31610 Villava, Spain

8. Associazione Agricola Randazzo, 66100 Chieti, Italy

9. Narodne Pol’Nohospodarske a Potravinaske Centrum, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovakia

10. Syngenta, Cambridge C B21 5XE, UK

Abstract

Overall, there is a major wish that European farmers implement integrated pest management (IPM), particularly to reduce dependence on pesticides. In the European Rustwatch project, partners conducted nineteen trials across nine different countries during 2020 and 2021 to investigate different IPM strategies, focusing on controlling rust diseases in winter wheat. The trials included the use of varieties with contrasting levels of resistance, variety mixtures, reduced fungicide rates, thresholds, and Decision Support Systems (DSSs), and testing alternative products to fungicides. Sixteen trials developed yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) infections, and six trials developed brown rust (Puccinia triticina) infections. Resistant varieties proved highly effective in keeping down yellow rust infection, and variety mixtures also effectively reduced infection levels and stabilized yields. Rust was fully controlled using 25% of standard fungicide rates, even under high disease pressure. Using DSSs provided sufficient control of rust diseases and resulted in competitive net economic returns due to fewer fungicide applications. The alternative products tested included two biological control agents and four alternative chemistries, which all gave inferior and insufficient control against rust compared with chemical fungicides. The trial work demonstrated that there are good and reliable options for including IPM into disease control in wheat.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Aarhus University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. Disease impact on wheat yield potential and prospects of genetic control;Singh;Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.,2016

2. Research investment implications of shifts in the global geography of wheat stripe rust;Beddow;Nat. Plants,2015

3. Estimating disease losses to the Australian wheat industry;Murray;Australas. Plant Pathol.,2009

4. Replacement of the European wheat yellow rust population by new races from the centre of diversity in the near-Himalayan region;Walter;Plant Pathol.,2015

5. IPM strategies and their dilemmas including an introduction to www.eurowheat.org;Hansen;J. Integr. Agric.,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3