Comparing Usability of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Creating Virtual Bounding Boxes of Real Objects
-
Published:2023-10-26
Issue:21
Volume:13
Page:11693
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Kyaw Nyan1, Gu Morris1, Croft Elizabeth2, Cosgun Akansel3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia 2. Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada 3. School of Info Technology, Melbourne Burwood Campus, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of user experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) headsets during an interactive semantic mapping task. This task entails the placement of virtual objects onto real-world counterparts. Our investigation focuses on discerning the distinctive features of each headset and their respective advantages within a semantic mapping context. The experiment employs a user interface enabling the creation, manipulation, and labeling of virtual 3D holograms. To ensure parity between the headsets, the VR headset mimics AR by relaying its camera feed to the user. A comprehensive user study, encompassing 12 participants tasked with mapping six tabletop objects, compares interface usability and performance between the headsets. The study participants’ evaluations highlight that the VR headset offers enhanced user-friendliness and responsiveness compared to the AR headset. Nonetheless, the AR headset excels in augmenting environmental perception and interpretation, surpassing VR in this aspect. Consequently, the study underscores that current handheld motion controllers for interacting with virtual environments outperform existing hand gesture interfaces. Furthermore, it suggests potential improvements for VR devices, including an upgraded camera feed integration. Significantly, this experiment unveils the feasibility of leveraging VR headsets for AR applications without compromising user experience. However, it also points to the necessity of future research addressing prolonged usage scenarios for both types of headsets in various interactive tasks.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference21 articles.
1. Bozgeyikli, E., and Bozgeyikli, L.L. (April, January 27). Evaluating object manipulation interaction techniques in mixed reality: Tangible user interfaces and gesture. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Lisbon, Portugal. 2. MRTouch: Adding Touch Input to Head-Mounted Mixed Reality;Xiao;IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.,2018 3. Batmaz, A.U., Machuca, M.D.B., Pham, D.M., and Stuerzlinger, W. (2019, January 23–27). Do head-mounted display stereo deficiencies affect 3D pointing tasks in AR and VR?. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan. 4. Gu, M., Cosgun, A., Chan, W.P., Drummond, T., and Croft, E. (2021, January 8–12). Seeing thru walls: Visualizing mobile robots in augmented reality. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. Waymouth, B., Cosgun, A., Newbury, R., Tran, T., Chan, W.P., Drummond, T., and Croft, E. (2021, January 8–12). Demonstrating cloth folding to robots: Design and evaluation of a 2d and a 3d user interface. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|