Affiliation:
1. Division of Humanities, Federal Institute of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil
Abstract
Non-Tarskian interpretations of many-valued logics have been widely explored in the logic literature. The development of non-tarskian conceptions of logical consequence set the theoretical foundations for rediscovering well-known (Tarskian) many-valued logics. One may find in distinct authors many novel interpretations of many-valued systems. They are produced through a type of procedure which consists in altering the semantic structure of Tarskian many-valued logics in order to output a non-Tarskian interpretation of these logics. Through this type of transformation the paper explores a uniform way of transforming finitely many-valued Tarskian logics into their non-Tarskian interpretation. Some general properties of carrying out this type of procedure are studied, namely the dualities between these logics and the conditions under which negation-explosive and negation-complete Tarskian logics become non-explosive.
Reference18 articles.
1. Inferential paraconsistency;Malinowski;Log. Log. Philos.,2000
2. Shramko, Y., and Wansing, H. (2011). Truth and Falsehood: An Inquiry into Generalized Logical Values, Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Tolerant, classical, strict;Cobreros;J. Philos. Log.,2012
4. Q-Consequence Operation;Malinowski;Rep. Math. Log.,1990
5. Relations between paraconsistent logic and many-valued logic;Alves;Bull. Sect. Log.,1981