Bearing Characteristics of Composite Foundation Reinforced by Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column: Field Tests and Numerical Analyses
-
Published:2023-03-29
Issue:7
Volume:15
Page:5965
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Wang Kaifeng1, Liu Mengjie1, Cao Jie2, Niu Jiayong23ORCID, Zhuang Yunxia4
Affiliation:
1. CSCEC Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050001, China 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China 3. Ningxia Institute of Water Resources Research, Yinchuan 750021, China 4. Jinan Machinery Industry Design and Research Institute, Jinan 250300, China
Abstract
In order to study the bearing characteristic of the geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) on the composite foundation, a series of field tests and numerical simulation were carried out on the composite foundations reinforced by the traditional stone column and the GESC. The pile–soil stress ratio, excess pore water pressure and lateral displacement of two kinds of composite foundations were monitored. The effects of geotextile stiffness, geotextile wrapping length and gravel internal friction angle on the composite foundation with the GESC were analyzed by establishing different numerical models. The results show that the GESC can bear larger loading compared with the traditional stone column. The pile–soil stress ratio of the composite foundation with the traditional stone column gradually increases from 1.1 to 1.5 with the increasing of the embankment height. However, the pile–soil stress ratio of the composite foundation with the GESC reaches 1.5 at the initial filling stage and increases to 1.7 with the filling construction. The drainage effect of the GESC is better than that of the traditional stone column, and the GESC can effectively improve the overall stiffness of stone column, so as to reduce the lateral displacement of soil mass. The increases of geotextile stiffness, geotextile wrapping length and gravel internal friction angle can improve the bearing performance of the composite foundation with the GESC. However, after geotextile stiffness and wrapping length reach a certain value, the influence of its lifting amount on the composite foundation will be reduced.
Funder
CSCEC Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference36 articles.
1. Van Impe, W.F. (1989). Soil Improvement Techniques and Their Evolution, Balkema. 2. Van Impe, W., and De Beer, E. (1983, January 23–26). Improvement of settlement behaviour of soft layers by means of stone columns. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Kempfert, H.G., and Gebreselassie, B. (2010). Excavations and Foundations in Soft Soils, Springer. 4. Grizi, A., Al-Ani, W., and Wanatowski, D. (2022). Numerical analysis of the settlement behavior of soft soil improved with stone columns. Appl. Sci., 12. 5. Chen, P., Lyu, W., Liang, X., Deng, J., Li, C., and Yuan, Y. (2022). Multi-Factor Influence analysis on the liquefaction mitigation of stone columns composite foundation. Appl. Sci., 12.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|