Affiliation:
1. Industrial AI Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
Abstract
The research reported in this article focuses on a comparison of two different approaches to setting error bounds, or prediction intervals, on short-term forecasting of solar irradiation as well as solar and wind farm output. Short term in this instance relates to the time scales applicable in the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM), which operates on a five-minute basis throughout the year. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has decided in recent years that, as well as point forecasts of energy, it is advantageous for planning purposes to have error bounds on those forecasts. We use quantile regression as one of the techniques to construct the bounds. This procedure is compared to a method of forecasting the conditional variance by use of either ARCH/GARCH or exponential smoothing, whichever is more appropriate for the specific application. The noise terms for these techniques must undergo a normalising transformation before their application. It seems that, for certain applications, quantile regression performs better, and the other technique for some other applications.
Reference21 articles.
1. Snell, T., West, S., Amos, M., Farah, S., Boland, J., Kay, M., and Prasad, A. (2020). Solar Power Ensemble Forecaster Final Report Project Summary and Findings, CSIRO. Technical Report.
2. Short term solar radiation forecasting: Island versus continental sites;Boland;Energy,2016
3. Comparison of intraday probabilistic forecasting of solar irradiance using only endogenous data;David;Int. J. Forecast.,2018
4. Probabilistic forecasting of the solar irradiance with recursive ARMA and GARCH models;David;Sol. Energy,2016
5. Forecasting solar radiation on an hourly time scale using a Coupled AutoRegressive and Dynamical System (CARDS) model;Huang;Sol. Energy,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献