Hydrogel Extrusion Speed Measurements for the Optimization of Bioprinting Parameters
Author:
Arjoca Stelian12ORCID, Bojin Florina13ORCID, Neagu Monica12ORCID, Păunescu Andreea4, Neagu Adrian125ORCID, Păunescu Virgil13
Affiliation:
1. Department of Functional Sciences, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania 2. Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania 3. OncoGen Institute, 300723 Timisoara, Romania 4. Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania 5. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the use of computer-controlled transfer processes for assembling bioinks (cell clusters or materials loaded with cells) into structures of prescribed 3D organization. The correct bioprinting parameters ensure a fast and accurate bioink deposition without exposing the cells to harsh conditions. This study seeks to optimize pneumatic extrusion-based bioprinting based on hydrogel flow rate and extrusion speed measurements. We measured the rate of the hydrogel flow through a cylindrical nozzle and used non-Newtonian hydrodynamics to fit the results. From the videos of free-hanging hydrogel strands delivered from a stationary print head, we inferred the extrusion speed, defined as the speed of advancement of newly formed strands. Then, we relied on volume conservation to evaluate the extrudate swell ratio. The theoretical analysis enabled us to compute the extrusion speed for pressures not tested experimentally as well as the printing speed needed to deposit hydrogel filaments of a given diameter. Finally, the proposed methodology was tested experimentally by analyzing the morphology of triple-layered square-grid hydrogel constructs printed at various applied pressures while the printing speeds matched the corresponding extrusion speeds. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that preliminary measurements and theoretical analyses can simplify the search for the optimal bioprinting parameters.
Funder
Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara
Reference33 articles.
1. Groll, J., Boland, T., Blunk, T., Burdick, J.A., Cho, D.-W., Dalton, P.D., Derby, B., Forgacs, G., Li, Q., and Mironov, V.A. (2016). Biofabrication: Reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication, 8. 2. Guillemot, F., Mironov, V., and Nakamura, M. (2010). Bioprinting is coming of age: Report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B′09). Biofabrication, 2. 3. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs;Murphy;Nat. Biotechnol.,2014 4. Duarte Campos, D.F., Lindsay, C.D., Roth, J.G., LeSavage, B.L., Seymour, A.J., Krajina, B.A., Ribeiro, R., Costa, P.F., Blaeser, A., and Heilshorn, S.C. (2020). Bioprinting Cell- and Spheroid-Laden Protein-Engineered Hydrogels as Tissue-on-Chip Platforms. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8. 5. Groll, J., Burdick, J.A., Cho, D.W., Derby, B., Gelinsky, M., Heilshorn, S.C., Jüngst, T., Malda, J., Mironov, V.A., and Nakayama, K. (2018). A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication, 11.
|
|