Faith in the Nominalistic Age? The Possible Theological Contribution of Hermeneutics

Author:

Grondin Jean1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, University of Montreal, 2900 Bd Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada

Abstract

This paper inquires about the defensibility of spiritual faith in this Nominalistic age, i.e., an age when all reality is reduced to scientifically ascertainable matter and all spiritual realities are deemed to be irreal. This Nominalistic worldview was developed in the late Middle Ages and became one of the major presuppositions of Modernity. It has made it ever more difficult to defend the legitimacy of faith and its objects. It also played an important, albeit seldom recognized, role in the emergence of Hermeneutical thought in the 20th Century. In his strong, if also seldom carefully studied, interpretation of Heidegger’s philosophy, Gadamer saw in the Nominalism of Modernity one of the main challenges to which Heidegger’s thinking wished to respond: the hegemony of the Nominalistic understanding of being would have led to the Nihilism of our technological Age and made the experience of the Divine unthinkable. After recalling the outlines of this interpretation and of the meaning of Nominalism itself, this paper argues that this Nominalism was also one of the main challenges Gadamer wanted to overcome with his Hermeneutics. It discusses how Hermeneutics strives to overcome this Nominalism by calling into question the monopoly of scientific truth (an effort summed up in the title “Truth and Method”) and through its renewed understanding of language as the presentation of Being itself, which goes hand in hand with the rediscovery of the Platonic metaphysics of the Beautiful. Hermeneutics thus shows how something like faith is defensible and thus makes an important theological and metaphysical contribution.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference26 articles.

1. Arbid, Dan (2017). Descartes, la métaphysique et l’infini, PUF.

2. Bardout, Jean-Christophe (2014). Penser l’existence, Tome 1: L’existence exposée: Époque médiévale, Vrin.

3. Bernstein, Richard (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, University of Pennsylvania Press.

4. Blanchette, Oliva (1992). The Perfection of the Universe according to Aquinas: A Teleological Cosmology, Pennsylvania State University Press.

5. Suárez and the Latent Essentialism of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology;Blanchette;Review of Metaphysics,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3