Examining Safe Food-Handling Knowledge, Behaviour, and Related Psychological Constructs among Individuals at Higher Risk of Food Poisoning and the General Population

Author:

Charlesworth Jessica12,Mullan Barbara A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia

2. School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia

Abstract

Safe food-handling knowledge and behaviour are low across the general population. This raises concerns about whether individuals at higher risk of food poisoning have sufficient safe food-handling knowledge and engage in safe food-handling practices. The aim of this study was to explore safe food-handling knowledge, behaviour, and related psychological constructs among individuals at higher risk of food poisoning and compare the results to the general population. Participants (N = 169) completed measures of safe food-handling knowledge, intention, habit strength, perceived risk, self-efficacy, subjective norms, and behaviour. A series of multivariate analyses of variance were conducted to determine differences in these measures between participants at higher risk of food poisoning and the general population. No significant differences in knowledge, intention, habit strength, self-efficacy, subjective norms, and behaviour were found between individuals at higher risk of food poisoning and the general population. However, individuals at higher risk of food poisoning appeared to have stronger risk perceptions across safe food-handling behaviours compared with the general population. This study demonstrated that individuals at higher risk of food poisoning do not have higher safe food-handling knowledge than the general population, and despite having higher risk perceptions around some safe food-handling behaviours, they do not differ in engagement in safe food-handling behaviours or the majority of related psychological constructs. Implications of these findings relate to the need to target other psychological constructs, not just risk perceptions, in order to see safer food-handling behaviours in high-risk populations.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science

Reference57 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2023, May 10). Food Safety. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety.

2. Australian Government Department of Health (2023, May 10). Foodborne Illness in Australia: Annual Incidence Circa 2010, Available online: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/E829FA59A59677C0CA257D6A007D2C97/$File/Foodborne-Illness-Australia-circa-2010.pdf.

3. Australian Institute of Food Safety (2023, May 10). World Food Safety Day: Food Safety, Everyone’s Business. Available online: https://www.foodsafety.com.au/blog/world-food-safety-day-food-safety-everyones-business.

4. Food Safety Information Council (2023, May 10). Australia’s Food Safety Report Card Released for the UN World Food Safety Day 7 June 2020. Available online: https://foodsafety.asn.au/topic/australias-food-safety-report-card-released-for-the-un-world-food-safety-day-7-june-2020/.

5. Australian National University (2022). The Annual Cost of Foodborne Illness in Australia, Australian National University.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3