Entropy as a Measure of Consistency in Software Architecture

Author:

Niepostyn Stanislaw Jerzy1,Daszczuk Wiktor Bohdan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science & Technologies, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw, 01-043 Warsaw, Poland

2. Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

In building software architectures, the relations between elements in different diagrams are often overlooked. The first stage of building IT systems is the use of ontology terminology, not software terminology, in the requirements engineering process. Then, when constructing software architecture, IT architects more or less consciously however introduce elements that represent the same classifier on different diagrams with similar names. These connections are called consistency rules and are usually not attached in any way in a modeling tool, and only a significant number of them in the models increase the quality of the software architecture. It is mathematically proved that the application of consistency rules increases the information content of software architecture. Authors show that increasing readability and ordering of software architecture by means of consistency rules have their mathematical rationale. In this article, we found proof of decreasing Shannon entropy while applying consistency rules in the construction of software architecture of IT systems. Therefore, it has been shown that marking selected elements in different diagrams with these same names is, therefore, an implicit way to increase the information content of software architecture while simultaneously improving its orderliness and readability. Moreover, this increase in the quality of the software architecture can be measured by entropy, which allows for checking whether the number of consistency rules is sufficient to compare different architectures, even of different sizes, thanks to entropy normalization, and checking during the development of the software architecture, what is the improvement in its orderliness and readability.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference49 articles.

1. (2011). Standard No. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011.

2. Kruchten, P. (1995). Architectural Blueprints—The “4 + 1” View Model of Software Architecture, IEEE Software; Philippe Kruchten Rational Software Corp.

3. Kruchten, P. (2000). The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley.

4. Object Management Group (2022, September 28). Model Driven Architecture (MDA), MDA Guide rev. 2.0, OMG Document ormsc/2014-06-01. Available online: http://www.omg.org/mda/specs.htm.

5. The Open Group (2009). TOGAF Version 9 Enterprise Edition: An Introduction, Andrew Josey. White Paper.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3