Lessons Learned from Active Clinical and Laboratory Surveillance during the Sheep Pox Virus Outbreak in Spain, 2022–2023
Author:
Villalba Rubén1ORCID, Haegeman Andy2ORCID, Ruano María José1ORCID, Gómez María Belén1, Cano-Gómez Cristina1ORCID, López-Herranz Ana1, Tejero-Cavero Jesús3, Capilla Jaime3, Bascuñan María Victoria3, De Regge Nick2, Agüero Montserrat1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratorio Central de Veterinaria (LCV), Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 28110 Algete, Spain 2. Sciensano, Infectious Diseases in Animals, Exotic and Vector-Borne Diseases, 1180 Brussels, Belgium 3. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain
Abstract
In September 2022, more than 50 years after its eradication from Spain, Sheep pox virus was confirmed by laboratory analysis in sheep showing characteristic lesions. This was the start of an outbreak that lasted 9 months and infected 30 farms dispersed over two different areas, Andalusia and Castilla-La Mancha. Early after the initial confirmation, an active surveillance based on clinical inspection with laboratory confirmation of sheep with clinical signs was started in restricted areas. This allowed the confirmation of Sheep pox in 22 out of 28 suspected farms, where limited numbers of sheep with mainly erythema and papules were found, indicative of early detection. Nevertheless, to improve active surveillance and stop the outbreak, clinical inspection was reinforced by laboratory analysis in all inspected farms, even when no clinically diseased sheep were detected. Although more than 35,000 oral swabs from 335 farms were analysed by real-time PCR in pools of five, only two out of six reported outbreaks in this period were detected by laboratory analysis before clinical signs were observed. Furthermore, additional insights were gained from the extensive laboratory surveillance performed on samples collected under field conditions. No evidence of Sheep pox virus infection was found in goats. Oral swabs proved to be the sample of choice for early detection in the absence of scabs and could be tested in pools of five without extensive loss in sensitivity; serology by ELISA was not useful in outbreak detection. Finally, a non-infectious genome of the virus could be detected months after cleaning and disinfection; thus, real-time PCR results should be interpreted with caution in sentinel animals during repopulation. In conclusion, the outbreak of Sheep pox virus in Spain showed that active clinical inspection with laboratory confirmation of clinically diseased sheep via oral swab testing proved a sensitive method for detection of infected farms, providing insights in laboratory surveillance that will be helpful for other countries confronted with Sheep pox outbreaks.
Reference21 articles.
1. WOAH (2024). Sheep pox and goat pox. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, WOAH. Available online: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.08.12_S_POX_G_POX.pdf. 2. Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., Ball, L.A., and Fauquet, C.M. (2005). Family Poxviridae. Virus Taxonomy: VIIIth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, Academic Press. 3. Capripoxviruses: An emerging worldwide threat to sheep, goats and cattle;Babiuk;Transbound. Emerg. Dis.,2008 4. Vero cell-attenuated Goatpox virus provides protection against virulent virus challenge;Hosamani;Acta Virol.,2003 5. Rapid preclinical detection of sheeppox virus by a real-time PCR assay;Balinsky;J. Clin. Microbiol.,2008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|