An Advanced Human Bone Tissue Culture Model for the Assessment of Implant Osteointegration In Vitro
-
Published:2024-05-13
Issue:10
Volume:25
Page:5322
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Maglio Melania1ORCID, Fini Milena2, Sartori Maria1ORCID, Codispoti Giorgia1, Borsari Veronica1ORCID, Dallari Dante3ORCID, Ambretti Simone45ORCID, Rocchi Martina3, Tschon Matilde1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, 40136 Bologna, Italy 2. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Scientific Direction, 40136 Bologna, Italy 3. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques—Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, 40136 Bologna, Italy 4. Microbiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy 5. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Abstract
In the field of biomaterials for prosthetic reconstructive surgery, there is the lack of advanced innovative methods to investigate the potentialities of smart biomaterials before in vivo tests. Despite the complex osteointegration process being difficult to recreate in vitro, this study proposes an advanced in vitro tissue culture model of osteointegration using human bone. Cubic samples of trabecular bone were harvested, as waste material, from hip arthroplasty; inner cylindrical defects were created and assigned to the following groups: (1) empty defects (CTRneg); (2) defects implanted with a cytotoxic copper pin (CTRpos); (3) defects implanted with standard titanium pins (Ti). Tissues were dynamically cultured in mini rotating bioreactors and assessed weekly for viability and sterility. After 8 weeks, immunoenzymatic, microtomographic, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were performed. The model was able to simulate the effects of implantation of the materials, showing a drop in viability in CTR+, while Ti appears to have a trophic effect on bone. MicroCT and a histological analysis supported the results, with signs of matrix and bone deposition at the Ti implant site. Data suggest the reliability of the tested model in recreating the osteointegration process in vitro with the aim of reducing and refining in vivo preclinical models.
Funder
Emilia-Romagna Region
Reference36 articles.
1. Biomaterials in orthopaedics;Navarro;J. R. Soc. Interface,2008 2. Szczęsny, G., Kopec, M., Politis, D.J., Kowalewski, Z.L., Łazarski, A., and Szolc, T. (2022). A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present. Materials, 15. 3. Al-Shalawi, F.D., Mohamed Ariff, A.H., Jung, D.W., Mohd Ariffin, M.K.A., Seng Kim, C.L., Brabazon, D., and Al-Osaimi, M.O. (2023). Biomaterials as Implants in the Orthopedic Field for Regenerative Medicine: Metal versus Synthetic Polymers. Polymers, 15. 4. Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., and Raimondi, M.T. (2020). Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Bone Scaffolds Optimization. Polymers, 12. 5. Moghaddam, N.S., Andani, M.T., Amerinatanzi, A., Haberland, C., Huff, S., Miller, M., Elahinia, M., and Dean, D. (2016). Metals for bone implants: Safety, design, and efficacy. Biomanuf. Rev., 1.
|
|