Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity-Generation Technologies: West Texas Case Study

Author:

Das Jani1ORCID,Ur Rehman Atta12,Verma Rahul3,Gulen Gurcan1,Young Michael1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

2. Weir Esco, Portland, OR 97210, USA

3. Fractal Business Analytics LLC, Austin, TX 78735-8004, USA

Abstract

This comparison of five power plants in West Texas is intended to provide various decision-makers and stakeholders with a holistic picture of the life-cycle environmental impacts associated with these power plants. A key contribution of this analysis is that we assumed all power plants generate the same amount of electricity over a 30-year life, taking a 500 MW combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant as a benchmark. Also, in two cases, we added battery storage to wind and solar PV facilities to render them nearly as dispatchable as the CCGT. We included the entire supply chain supporting electricity generation, which encompassed raw material sourcing, processing, manufacturing, operations, and product end of life, also called “cradle to grave”. We report on 18 environmental impacts using ReCiPe midpoint (H) impact assessment. The supply chains are global, and impacts are felt differently by host communities across the world. The results can help stakeholders identify hotspots across numerous supply chains with the highest environmental impacts. We discuss some remedial measures and challenges to inform future analysis by the research community.

Funder

“Comparing Electricity Options”, Industrial Affiliates Program of the Bureau of Economic Geology and the Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference61 articles.

1. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Report of World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

2. Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania;Turskis;Renew. Energy,2016

3. Masson-Delmotte, V.P., Zhai, H.-O., Pörtner, D., Roberts, J., Skea, P.R., Shukla, A., Pirani, W., Moufouma-Okia, C., Péan, R., and Pidcock, S. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

4. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2023, July 30). Carbon Neutrality in the UNECE Region: Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity Sources: United Nations, Geneva. Available online: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/LCA_3_FINAL%20March%202022.pdf.

5. Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis;Maxim;Energy Policy,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3