In Vitro Evaluation of Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns and Post and Core Crowns—A Systematic Review

Author:

Qamar Zeeshan1,Alghamdi Ahmed Mohammed Saad2,Haydarah Naji Khaled Bin2,Balateef Abdulateef Ahmed2,Alamoudi Ahmed Aydhah3,Abumismar Munther Amer2,Mathur Ankita45,Minervini Giuseppe6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of O&MFS and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh 13244, Saudi Arabia

2. Al-Iman General Hospital, Riyadh 12684, Saudi Arabia

3. Al Dar Albaidhaa 2 PHC, Riyadh 12684, Saudi Arabia

4. STAT SENSE, Srushti 10, Sector 1 D, Amba Township Pvt. Ltd., Trimandir, Adalaj 382421, Gujarat, India

5. Department of Periodontology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India

6. Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the results of the studies that have compared the physical and mechanical properties of lithium disilicate (LDS) endocrowns constructed for posterior teeth to those retained by post-and-core retention systems. The review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search process was conducted on PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase and ISI Web of Knowledge (WoS) from the earliest available date till 31 January 2023. Additionally, the studies were assessed for their overall quality and risk of bias using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (the QUIN). The initial search resulted in 291 articles, out of which, only 10 studies met the eligibility criteria. In all studies LDS endocrowns were compared with various kinds of endodontic posts and crowns made from other materials. There were no definite pattern or trends observed in the fracture strengths of tested specimens. There was no predilection observed in failure patters among the experimental specimens. No predilection was observed in the fracture strengths of LDS endocrowns when compared to post-and-core crowns. Furthermore, no differences in failure patterns could be observed when both types of restorations were compared. The authors propose standardized testing of endocrowns against post-and-core crowns in future studies. In conclusion, long-term clinical trials are advocated to compare the survival, failure and complication rates of LDS endocrowns and post-and-core restorations.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials

Reference44 articles.

1. Prosthodontics Dental Materials: From Conventional to Unconventional;Saeed;Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.,2020

2. Postendodontic Restoration: Endodontic Post-and-Core or No Post At All?;Naumann;J. Adhes. Dent.,2018

3. CAD/CAM Post-and-Core Using Different Esthetic Materials: Fracture Resistance and Bond Strengths;Farias;Am. J. Dent.,2017

4. The Effect of Conventional, Half-Digital, and Full-Digital Fabrication Techniques on the Retention and Apical Gap of Post and Core Restorations;Hendi;J. Prosthet. Dent.,2019

5. Fracture Behaviors of Maxillary Central Incisors with Flared Root Canals Restored with CAD/CAM Integrated Glass Fiber Post-and-Core;Pang;Dent. Mater. J.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3