Surface Motion and Topographic Effects on Ice Thickness Inversion for High Mountain Asia Glaciers: A Comparison Study from Three Numerical Models

Author:

Pang Xiaoguang12,Jiang Liming12,Guo Rui12ORCID,Xu Zhida12,Li Xiaoen12,Lu Xi12

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated the accuracy of ice thickness model inversions, but the effects of surface velocity and topographic factors have not been fully studied. Because of the important potential of models for estimating regional and global ice thickness, the influence of the characteristics of the glaciers themselves on the models is unknown. Therefore, we estimated the thickness of 10 glaciers in HMA based on remote sensing data using the GlabTop2, GV22, and VOLTA models, and we analyzed the factors affecting accuracy. The first two models are representative of the widely used shallow ice approximation and laminar flow theory, and the latter is a new model based on shallow ice approximation. The results show that the RMSEs for GlabTop2, VOLTA, and GV22 are 36.6 m, 56.8 m, and 63.2 m, respectively. The accuracy of the three models differed obviously under the influence of different slopes, aspects, and surface velocities. In contrast to glaciers with higher surface velocities, GV22 is more suitable for glaciers with smaller surface velocities, and the accuracy of the model is significantly reduced when surface velocities are greater than 50 m/yr. Aspect has an effect on the accuracy of the GV22 ice thickness inversion but not on the other models. Ice thicknesses estimated using the three models is more reliable at surface slopes of 16–24°. These three models do not apply to gentle glaciers such as icecaps. Our study provides an important reference for choosing a suitable model to invert the glacier thickness in HMA.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Key R & D Program of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3