Highly Sensitive Whole-Cell Mercury Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring
-
Published:2024-05-13
Issue:5
Volume:14
Page:246
-
ISSN:2079-6374
-
Container-title:Biosensors
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biosensors
Author:
Zevallos-Aliaga Dahlin1ORCID, De Graeve Stijn2ORCID, Obando-Chávez Pamela1ORCID, Vaccari Nicolás A.1ORCID, Gao Yue3ORCID, Peeters Tom2ORCID, Guerra Daniel G.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratorio de Moléculas Individuales, Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 15102, Peru 2. Open BioLab Brussels, Erasmushogeschool Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 121, B-1090 Jette, Belgium 3. Archaeology, Environmental Changes and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Abstract
Whole-cell biosensors could serve as eco-friendly and cost-effective alternatives for detecting potentially toxic bioavailable heavy metals in aquatic environments. However, they often fail to meet practical requirements due to an insufficient limit of detection (LOD) and high background noise. In this study, we designed a synthetic genetic circuit specifically tailored for detecting ionic mercury, which we applied to environmental samples collected from artisanal gold mining sites in Peru. We developed two distinct versions of the biosensor, each utilizing a different reporter protein: a fluorescent biosensor (Mer-RFP) and a colorimetric biosensor (Mer-Blue). Mer-RFP enabled real-time monitoring of the culture’s response to mercury samples using a plate reader, whereas Mer-Blue was analysed for colour accumulation at the endpoint using a specially designed, low-cost camera setup for harvested cell pellets. Both biosensors exhibited negligible baseline expression of their respective reporter proteins and responded specifically to HgBr2 in pure water. Mer-RFP demonstrated a linear detection range from 1 nM to 1 μM, whereas Mer-Blue showed a linear range from 2 nM to 125 nM. Our biosensors successfully detected a high concentration of ionic mercury in the reaction bucket where artisanal miners produce a mercury–gold amalgam. However, they did not detect ionic mercury in the water from active mining ponds, indicating a concentration lower than 3.2 nM Hg2+—a result consistent with chemical analysis quantitation. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of Mer-Blue as a practical and affordable monitoring tool, highlighting its stability, reliance on simple visual colorimetry, and the possibility of sensitivity expansion to organic mercury.
Funder
VLIR-UOS, the Flemish Interuniversity Council for Development Cooperation, South Initiative
Reference49 articles.
1. Mercury in the Anthropocene Ocean;Lamborg;Oceanog,2014 2. Mercury Deposition, Climate Change and Anthropogenic Activities: A Review;Li;Front. Earth Sci.,2020 3. Gautam, R.K., Sharma, S.K., Mahiya, S., and Chattopadhyaya, M.C. (2014). Heavy Metals in Water, Royal Society of Chemistry. 4. Toxicodynamics of Lead, Cadmium, Mercury and Arsenic- induced kidney toxicity and treatment strategy: A mini review;Rana;Toxicol. Rep.,2018 5. Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Luo, Z., Guo, S., and Strähle, U. (2020). Toxicity of mercury: Molecular evidence. Chemosphere, 245.
|
|