Abstract
The simple and straightforward recognition of Triticum species is not an easy task due to their complex genetic origins. To provide a recommendation, we have compared the performance of different PCR-based methods relying on the discrimination ability of the Q- and γ-gliadin (GAG56D) genes, as well as TBP (Tubulin-Based Polymorphism), a method based on the multiple amplification of genes of the β-tubulin family. Among these approaches, the PCR-RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) assay based on a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) present in the Q gene is the only one capable of fully discerning hexaploid spelt and common wheat species, while both γ-gliadin and TBP fail with similar error frequencies. The Q-locus assay results in the attainment of either a single fragment or a doublet, depending on the presence of a suitable restriction site, which is affected by the mutation. This dual pattern of resolution limits both the diagnostic effectiveness, when additional Triticum species are assayed and compared to each other, and its usefulness, when commercially available flours are analyzed. These limitations are overtaken by flanking the Q-locus assay with the TBP analysis. In this way, almost all of the Triticum species can be accurately identified.
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献