Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Microarrays in Fetuses with High-Risk Prenatal Indications: Polish Experience with 7400 Pregnancies

Author:

Kowalczyk KatarzynaORCID,Bartnik-Głaska MagdalenaORCID,Smyk Marta,Plaskota IzabelaORCID,Bernaciak Joanna,Kędzior Marta,Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik BarbaraORCID,Deperas Marta,Domaradzka Justyna,Łuszczek AlicjaORCID,Dutkiewicz Daria,Kozar Agata,Grad Dominika,Niemiec MagdalenaORCID,Ziemkiewicz Kamila,Magdziak Róża,Braun-Walicka Natalia,Barczyk Artur,Geremek MaciejORCID,Castañeda Jennifer,Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak AnnaORCID,Własienko Paweł,Jakubów-Durska Krystyna,Dębska MarzenaORCID,Kucińska-Chahwan AnnaORCID,Kozłowski SzymonORCID,Mikulska Boyana,Issat TadeuszORCID,Roszkowski Tomasz,Nawara-Baran Agnieszka,Runge Agata,Jakubiuk-Tomaszuk Anna,Kruczek Anna,Kostyk Ewa,Pietras Grzegorz,Limon Janusz,Zwoliński Jerzy,Ochman Karolina,Szajner Tomasz,Węgrzyn PiotrORCID,Wielgoś Mirosław,Sąsiadek Maria,Obersztyn Ewa,Nowakowska Beata Anna

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the comparative genomic hybridization to microarray (aCGH) technique for prenatal diagnosis, but also to assess the frequency of chromosomal aberrations that may lead to fetal malformations but are not included in the diagnostic report. We present the results of the aCGH in a cohort of 7400 prenatal cases, indicated for invasive testing due to ultrasound abnormalities, high-risk for serum screening, thickened nuchal translucency, family history of genetic abnormalities or congenital abnormalities, and advanced maternal age (AMA). The overall chromosomal aberration detection rate was 27.2% (2010/7400), including 71.2% (1431/2010) of numerical aberrations and 28.8% (579/2010) of structural aberrations. Additionally, the detection rate of clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) was 6.8% (505/7400) and 0.7% (57/7400) for variants of unknown clinical significance. The detection rate of clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs was 7.9% (334/4204) for fetuses with structural anomalies, 5.4% (18/336) in AMA, 3.1% (22/713) in the group of abnormal serum screening and 6.1% (131/2147) in other indications. Using the aCGH method, it was possible to assess the frequency of pathogenic chromosomal aberrations, of likely pathogenic and of uncertain clinical significance, in the groups of cases with different indications for an invasive test.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3