Concept Maps to Assess System Understanding: Are Graphical Explanations More Accurate than Verbal Ones?

Author:

Schmidt Judith12ORCID,Wollermann Lilli2,Abele Stephan1,Müller Romy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Education, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany

2. Faculty of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Solving problems in a technical system usually requires people to understand its functioning on different levels of abstraction (i.e., goals, functions, components, characteristics) that are connected via means–ends links. We combined this abstraction hierarchy with concept mapping to assess people’s understanding of system functioning. The present study examines the benefits and drawbacks of the proposed method by comparing it to a viable alternative, namely verbal explanation. Using a set of pre-defined concepts, twenty-four participants explained the functioning of two everyday systems: one graphically by constructing a concept map and one verbally. The verbal explanations were subsequently transformed into concept maps by the authors. Compared to verbal explanations, participant-constructed concept maps contained a higher proportion of functional propositions, and lower proportions of structural, temporal, general, and other propositions. Contrary to our expectations, there was no difference regarding the accuracy of functional propositions. Even though participants needed far less time to explain system functioning verbally, our results indicate that concept mapping is better suited to assess functional system understanding. We discuss how this benefit relates to the cognitive processes during concept mapping, and how the method needs to be adapted to assess functional understanding of more complex systems.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference40 articles.

1. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.

2. Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems;Marathe;J. Learn. Sci.,2007

3. Expert-novice differences in mental models of viruses, vaccines, and the causes of infectious disease;Jee;Public Underst. Sci.,2015

4. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices;Chi;Cogn. Sci.,1981

5. The training effects of principle knowledge on fault diagnosis performance;Ham;Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind.,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3