Interaction Difference Hypothesis Test for Prediction Models

Author:

Welchowski Thomas1ORCID,Edelmann Dominic2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

2. Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Abstract

Machine learning research focuses on the improvement of prediction performance. Progress was made with black-box models that flexibly adapt to the given data. However, due to their increased complexity, black-box models are more difficult to interpret. To address this issue, techniques for interpretable machine learning have been developed, yet there is still a lack of methods to reliably identify interaction effects between predictors under uncertainty. In this work, we present a model-agnostic hypothesis test for the identification of interaction effects in black-box machine learning models. The test statistic is based on the difference between the variance of the estimated prediction function and a version of the estimated prediction function without interaction effects derived via partial dependence functions. The properties of the proposed hypothesis test were explored in simulations of linear and nonlinear models. The proposed hypothesis test can be applied to any black-box prediction model, and the null hypothesis of the test can be flexibly specified according to the research question of interest. Furthermore, the test is computationally fast to apply, as the null distribution does not require the resampling or refitting of black-box prediction models.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference58 articles.

1. Clarke, B.S., and Clarke, J.L. (2018). Predictive Statistics, Cambridge University Press.

2. Prediction, Estimation, and Attribution;Efron;J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,2020

3. Invariance, Causality and Robustness;Buehlmann;Stat. Sci.,2020

4. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning;Murdoch;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2019

5. A general black box theory;Bunge;Philos. Sci.,1963

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3