Deep Learning-Based Truthful and Deceptive Hotel Reviews

Author:

Gupta Devbrat1ORCID,Bhargava Anuja1ORCID,Agarwal Diwakar1ORCID,Alsharif Mohammed H.2ORCID,Uthansakul Peerapong3ORCID,Uthansakul Monthippa3,Aly Ayman A.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Electronics & Communication, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India

2. Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea

3. School of Telecommunication Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

For sustainable hospitality and tourism, the validity of online evaluations is crucial at a time when they influence travelers’ choices. Understanding the facts and conducting a thorough investigation to distinguish between truthful and deceptive hotel reviews are crucial. The urgent need to discern between truthful and deceptive hotel reviews is addressed by the current study. This misleading “opinion spam” is common in the hospitality sector, misleading potential customers and harming the standing of hotel review websites. This data science project aims to create a reliable detection system that correctly recognizes and classifies hotel reviews as either true or misleading. When it comes to natural language processing, sentiment analysis is essential for determining the text’s emotional tone. With an 800-instance dataset comprising true and false reviews, this study investigates the sentiment analysis performance of three deep learning models: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Among the training, testing, and validation sets, the CNN model yielded the highest accuracy rates, measuring 98%, 77%, and 80%, respectively. Despite showing balanced precision and recall, the LSTM model was not as accurate as the CNN model, with an accuracy of 60%. There were difficulties in capturing sequential relationships, for which the RNN model further trailed, with accuracy rates of 57%, 57%, and 58%. A thorough assessment of every model’s performance was conducted using ROC curves and classification reports.

Funder

Suranaree University of Technology

Thailand Science Research and Innovation

National Science, Research and Innovation Fund

Taif University, Saudi Arabia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference29 articles.

1. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., and Hancock, J.T. (2011). Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination. arXiv.

2. Ott, M., Cardie, C., and Hancock, J.T. (2013, January 9–14). Negative Deceptive Opinion Spam. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, GA, USA. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/N13-1053.

3. Métais, E., Meziane, F., Vadera, S., Sugumaran, V., and Saraee, M. (2019). Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, Springer International Publishing.

4. Content analysis of fake consumer reviews by survey-based text categorization;Moon;Int. J. Res. Mark.,2021

5. Illusions of truth—Experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews;Plotkina;J. Bus. Res.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3