Seasonal and Size-Related Fish Microhabitat Use Upstream and Downstream from Small Hydropower Plants
Author:
Santos José M.1ORCID, Leite Renan12ORCID, Costa Maria J.2ORCID, Godinho Francisco3ORCID, Portela Maria M.2ORCID, Pinheiro António N.2ORCID, Boavida Isabel2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Forest Research Centre (CEF), Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal 2. Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal 3. Hidroerg, Projetos Energéticos Lda., 1300-327 Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract
Hydropower can have significant impacts on riverine ecosystems due to hydropeaking (i.e., artificial rapid and short-term fluctuations in water flow and water levels downstream and upstream of hydropower stations) that negatively affect downstream fish. However, when it comes to analyzing species habitat use and availability above and below small hydropower plants (SHPPs), studies conducted at the microhabitat scale are scarcer, particularly in Mediterranean rivers. The goal of this study is to assess the seasonal (early and late summer) and size-related (juveniles and adults) microhabitat use by native fish above and below SHPPs. Fish were sampled by a modified point electrofishing procedure, and a multivariate approach was used to analyze microhabitat use and availability data from sites located upstream (reference) and downstream (disturbed) from two SHPPs in northeast Portugal. Cover and water depth were the most influential variables in the use of microhabitat for all species at both the reference and disturbed sites, although some differences in the variable rankings were found. Leuciscids exhibited similar patterns of non-random (i.e., selective) microhabitat use between the reference and the disturbed sites. Overall, the seasonal and size-related patterns in species microhabitat use were similar, with the majority of species displaying seasonal patterns in microhabitat use from early summer to late summer. This study showed that differences in fish microhabitat use between downstream SHPP and upstream reference sites were negligible. Cover might have had a significant role in tempering the effects of detrimental environmental conditions, namely, peaking flows, by providing hydraulic shelter, highlighting the need to maintain riparian vegetation strips and mosaics of submerged aquatic macrophytes, as well as the provision of coarse substrata that can be critical for fish. Future studies are needed to better clarify how different size classes of fish select microhabitats when facing past and present hydropeaking conditions.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P. (FCT), Portugal
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference90 articles.
1. Climate Impacts of Hydropower: Enormous Differences among Facilities and over Time;Ocko;Environ. Sci. Technol.,2019 2. Editorial: Green or Red: Challenges for Fish and Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation Related to Hydropower;Geist;Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst.,2021 3. Tsiropoulos, I., Nijs, W., Tarvydas, D., and Ruiz, P. (2020). Towards Net-Zero Emissions in the EU Energy System by 2050: Insights from Scenarios in Line with the 2030 and 2050 Ambitions of the European Green Deal, Publications Office of the European Union. 4. Emerging Threats and Persistent Conservation Challenges for Freshwater Biodiversity;Reid;Biol. Rev.,2019 5. Twardek, W.M., Cowx, I.G., Lapointe, N.W.R., Paukert, C., Beard, T.D., Bennett, E.M., Browne, D., Carlson, A.K., Clarke, K.D., and Hogan, Z. (2022). Bright Spots for Inland Fish and Fish000eries to Guide Future Hydropower Development. Water Biol. Secur., 1.
|
|