Abstract
Knowledge about the prevalence of doping in recreational sports is still limited and fragmented. The same holds true for explanations of doping prevalence rates among different groups. One of the few theoretical models that exists uses the concept of consumer capital based on Stigler and Becker’s theory of rational addiction. Building on the largest study on doping in recreational sports that has ever been conducted in Europe, the FAIR+ survey, hypotheses on the differences in doping prevalence rates, by the level of participation in competitions and by the relative time spent participating in the sport are, developed. Statistical tests support the model while also drawing attention to the limitations of this theoretical explanation.
Funder
Erasmus+ Program of the European Union
Subject
Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. A New Method of Examining Relationships Between Individual Difference Measures and Sensitive Behavior Criteria. Evaluating the Unmatched Count Technique;Ahart;Organizational Research Methods,2004
2. Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: An integrated approach;Barkoukis;Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports,2013
3. The economics of doping;Berentsen;European Journal of Political Economy,2002
4. Fraudulent accounting and other doping games;Berentsen;Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft,2004
5. The Doping Dilemma. Some game theoretical and philosophical considerations;Breivik;Sportwissenschaft,1987
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献