Preservation of the Posterior Interspinous Ligamentary Complex in Posterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Author:

Gondar Renato12,Jesse Christopher Marvin1ORCID,Schär Ralph T.1ORCID,Fichtner Jens13,Fung Christian14ORCID,Raabe Andreas1,Ulrich Christian T.15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

3. Cantonal Medical Service, Department of Health of the Canton of Bern, 3027 Bern, Switzerland

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Hospital, University of Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany

5. Neurosurgery, Lindenhof Hospital, 3001 Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF) allow some variation between surgeons, particularly regarding the extent of resection of the posterior interspinous ligamentary complex (PILC) with uncertain implications for outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of preserving the PILC when performing PLIF or TLIF. Systematic review of clinical outcomes (adjacent segment degeneration (ASDG), fusion rate, reoperation rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain) after PLIF/TLIF matched for integrity of PILC, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and radiological parameters. A total of 191 patients from 2 studies (1 prospective randomized control trial (RCT) and 1 retrospective observational cohort study) were identified. 102 (53.4%) had fusion (PLIF/TLIF) with preserved PILC. All 120 patients in the RCT underwent a L4–L5 single-level fusion, while the 71 patients in the retrospective cohort underwent surgery between T11 and S1. In the retrospective cohort study, significant differences between groups in mean number of fixed levels (4.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 0.5), decompressed levels (2.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7), and interbody fusions (1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 1.0) were reported. In each of the studies, all groups reported an improved ODI score at 3 months after surgery and at last follow-up. In each of the studies, the incidence of radiographic ASDG was significantly higher for the PILC resection group in both studies (9.0% vs. 43.0%, p < 0.01 and 23.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.042). Lumbar lordosis (which decreased after PILC resection in the RCT, p < 0.05) also differed between groups. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that preservation of the PILC during PLIF/TLIF surgery prevents future ASDG and loss of lumbar lordosis as well as the potential clinical consequences of these changes. Further prospective studies are needed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference37 articles.

1. Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal;Briggs;J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.,1944

2. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care;Cloward;J. Neurosurg.,1953

3. Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik;Harms;Orthop. Traumatol.,1998

4. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group;Fritzell;Spine,2001

5. Lumbar interbody fusion: Techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF;Mobbs;J. Spine Surg.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3