Hepatitis B Management in the Middle East: A Narrative Review of Current Antiviral Treatments

Author:

Beck Hannah1,Dalavaye Nishaanth1ORCID,Kengadaran Kalaikshiga1,Khatun Mosammath Monira1,Patel Ria Hitesh1,Al-Rubaye Taif2,Alrubaiy Laith345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

2. Primary Care Services, National Health Service, Manchester M26 2SP, UK

3. Healthpoint Hospital, Abu Dhabi 112308, United Arab Emirates

4. International Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology, London NW1 4LB, UK

5. Department of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Singleton Bay Campus, Swansea University School of Medicine, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant public health issue worldwide, especially in the Middle East region. Around 8% to 20% of patients with CHB develop cirrhosis, which may progress to hepatocellular carcinoma. The significant morbidity and mortality associated with CHB denote the importance of high-quality treatment. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2024 to identify relevant studies. Search terms were generated using established treatment guidelines for CHB. We also manually searched the bibliographies of relevant literature to obtain additional papers. Results: In this narrative review, we evaluated the seven currently licensed antiviral therapies for chronic Hepatitis B treatment, including nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNα). NAs can be divided into two categories: high barrier to resistance and low barrier to resistance. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide, and entecavir are NAs with a high barrier to resistance. Telbivudine has shown promise in providing high efficacy with low viral resistance rates; however, it is not recommended because of insufficient evidence and lack of cost-effectiveness. Lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, despite being efficacious, have a low barrier to resistance, the primary reason they are no longer recommended. PEG-IFNα has high efficacy and can be completed in 48 weeks. It is not associated with resistance; however, it has been reported to have several systemic adverse effects. Conclusions: Current first-line NA treatments in the Middle East include entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide. These drugs are favored over other NAs because of their low rates of resistance. PEG-IFNα has superiority over NAs in inducing a more durable antiviral response and having a finite treatment duration. The main drawback of PEG-IFNα is an unfavorable safety profile.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference72 articles.

1. WHO (2024, July 18). Hepatitis B. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b.

2. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection;Lampertico;J. Hepatol.,2017

3. Regional Epidemiology, Burden, and Management of Hepatitis B Virus in the Middle East;Zeybel;Clin. Liver Dis.,2020

4. Hepatitis B: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries;Franco;World J. Hepatol.,2012

5. Hepatitis B virus infection in Saudi Arabia and the UAE: Public health challenges and their remedial measures;Sanai;J. Infect. Public Health,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3