Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Behaviour of Pedestrians

Author:

Paul Deborah1ORCID,Moridpour Sara1ORCID,Nguyen Le Andrew1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has considerably impacted pedestrians’ perceived comfort in a public setting. The virus’s transmissibility and social distancing restrictions have resulted in a shift in pedestrians’ perceived comfort, with more pedestrians becoming more conscious of other pedestrians and the distance between pedestrians. The changes in pedestrians’ perception have resulted in the Pedestrian Level Of Service (PLOS) models becoming outdated. The models may not accurately portray the actual status of pedestrians’ Level Of Service (LOS) according to the pedestrian needs during a pandemic, which generally lasts for a couple of years. These pandemics will happen in the future; hence, their impact on pedestrian comfort on sidewalks is worth considering. This research aims to analyse the effect of COVID-19 on PLOS by compiling data using a face-to-face questionnaire survey in the Melbourne Central Business District (CBD). From the 445 completed surveys, 72% of respondents extensively considered social distancing due to COVID-19 when commuting in the CBD, and 49% preferred a 1–1.5 m distance between pedestrians. In conjunction with an in-depth analysis of the data, an ordinal regression model has been used to analyse the factors that influence the perceived comfort of the pedestrians and estimate the PLOS. The model results show that pedestrian density, COVID-19 social distancing, continuous footpath, and pedestrian flow in opposite directions on the sidewalk greatly impacted the walking comfort of pedestrians during the pandemic.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference46 articles.

1. Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S., Bührmann, S., and Bohler-Baedeker, S. (2013). Guidelines—Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan, Rupprecht Consult-Forschung und Beratung GmbH.

2. (2021, October 20). Mayor of London. Green Transport. 2018, Available online: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/transport/green-transport.

3. Quantifying Pedestrian Friendliness—Guidelines for Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service;Gallin;Road Transp. Res.,2001

4. HCM (2010). Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board.

5. Lazou, O., Sakellariou, A., Basbas, S., Paschalidis, E., and Politis, I. (2015, January 14–15). Assessment of LOS at pedestrian streets and qualitative factors. A pedestrians’ perception approach. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Transportation Research, Athens, Greece.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effects of social distancing markers on single-file pedestrian movement during the pandemic;Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment;2024-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3