Proposal for Structured Histopathology of Nasal Secretions for Endotyping Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

Background: The EPOS guidelines promote cellular analysis as a primary goal in endotyping chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Current analysis is mainly based on biopsy or operative tissue collection, whereas the use of sinonasal secretions for inflammatory endotyping is not advocated in clinical practice. Early endotyping is crucial though, especially regarding the increasing evidence of patient-tailored therapy. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and reproducibility of sinonasal secretions sampling. Methods: First, preoperative secretion analysis of 53 Caucasian CRS patients was compared to subsequent operative tissue analysis. Second, secretion analysis at two different time points was compared for 10 postoperative Caucasian CRS patients with type 2 (T2) inflammation and 10 control participants. Secretions were collected by both endoscopic aspiration and nasal blown secretions in all participants. Results: The sensitivity to detect T2 inflammation was higher in nasal aspiration samples (85%) compared to nasal blow secretions (32%). A specificity of 100% for both techniques was obtained. A 90% reproducibility for T2 eosinophil detection was found by sampling at different time points regardless of the technique. Of the T2 patients, 60% showed no T2 inflammatory pattern more than one year after endoscopic sinus surgery. Conclusions: Nasal secretion sampling, especially aspiration of nasal secretions, is useful in the detection of T2 inflammation in CRS pathology. We proposed a structured histopathology analysis to be useful in daily clinical practice, which includes Congo red staining sensitive for eosinophilic cells and free eosinophil granules. Analysis of nasal secretions enables endotyping in an early stage, allowing more directed therapy.