Lessons Learned and Outcomes from Risk-Based Modernisation of Post-Mortem Inspection and Disposition Criteria of Beef, Sheep, Goat, and Pig Carcasses in Australia

Author:

Pointon Andrew1,Kiermeier Andreas2ORCID,Hamilton David3,Allan Samantha4,Jenson Ian5ORCID,Stevens Daryl6,McDonald Ann7,Langbridge John8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. APFoodIntegrity Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box 7070, West Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5022, Australia

2. Statistical Process Improvement Consulting and Training Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box 301, Gumeracha, SA 5233, Australia

3. D Hamilton Consulting Pty. Ltd., 46 High Street, Willunga, SA 5172, Australia

4. Meat Export Branch, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forests, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

5. Meat & Livestock Australia, 1/40 Mount St., North Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia

6. Atura Pty. Ltd., Mount Martha, Melbourne, VIC 3934, Australia

7. Australian Meat Processor Corporation, Suite 2, Level 6, 99 Walker Street, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia

8. Teys Australia, Building 3, 2728 Logan Rd., Eight Mile Plains, Brisbane, QLD 4113, Australia

Abstract

The lessons learned from reviewing national risk assessments to modernise the Australian Standard for the post-mortem inspection and disposition judgement of beef, sheep, goat, and pig carcases are discussed. The initial risk profiles identified priorities for quantitative assessments. Broadly, the main difficulty encountered was the paucity of quantified performance for the current inspection. Resolving this involved acquiring gross abnormality data representing regional production/proportional abattoir volumes, the range of gross abnormalities appearing nationally, proportional occurrence at carcase sites, and seasonality to enable the comparison of procedures. The methodologies followed the Codex Alimentarius Commission’s risk assessment guidelines and are fully documented in the associated publications. The evidence and discussion are provided for the associated challenges experienced, including preventing contamination, the use of food chain information to support amendment, inspection as a part of industry Quality Assurance programmes, and opportunities to improve inspector training. The criteria considered by the Competent Authority for the determination of the equivalence of alternative post-mortem inspection techniques included comparisons of public health risk, non-detection rates for gross abnormalities, and microbial contamination resulting from inspection activities, as appropriate. Most of the gross abnormalities detected arose from animal health and welfare conditions affecting wholesomeness and did not present as food safety hazards. The non-detection rates between the current and alternative inspection (observation) were negligible. A quantitative risk assessment for Cysticercus bovis was conducted. Carcases with multiple gross abnormalities predominantly reflected historic infections (prior septicaemia), where trimming achieved wholesomeness unless they were cachexic.

Funder

Australian Pork Ltd.

Meat & Livestock Australia

Australian Meat Processors Corporation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference63 articles.

1. (2024, July 22). SAFEMEAT—A Partnership between Government and Industry. Available online: https://www.safemeat.com.au/about/.

2. (2007). Hygienic Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption. Technical Support Series 3 (Standard No. Australian Standard AS 4696:2007). Available online: https://www.primesafe.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AS-4696-2007.pdf.

3. (2024, July 21). CAC/RCP 58-2005. The Codex Code of Hygienic Practice for Meat 2005. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/codes-of-practice/en/.

4. World Trade Organization (1994). Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (WTO Doc LT/UR/A-1A/12), World Trade Organization.

5. World Trade Organization (1994). Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (No. 31874), World Trade Organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3