Affiliation:
1. Austrian Competence Centre for Feed and Food Quality, Safety and Innovation (FFoQSI), Technopark 1D, 3430 Tulln, Austria
2. Institute of Food Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Even low levels of dairy propionic acid bacteria (dPAB) can cause cheese defects, resulting in severe economic losses for the producers of selected raw milk cheeses. Therefore, routine quality control of raw cheese milk for dPAB contamination is essential if propionic acid fermentation is undesired. Although knowledge of dPAB contamination of raw milk is important to understand cheese spoilage, long-term dPAB screening data are outdated, and studies taking into account different farm management parameters and their potential influence on dPAB levels are scarce. This study aims to provide insight into the dPAB levels of raw milk over time, to identify farm management factors that potentially influence dPAB levels, and to compare a cultural yeast extract lactate agar (YELA) and lithium glycerol agar (LGA) and a culture-independent method (qPCR) for dPAB quantification with respect to their applicability in routine quality control for the dairy industry. For this purpose, bulk tank milk from 25 dairy farms was screened for dPAB contamination over a one-year period. We were able to identify significant differences in the dPAB contamination levels in raw milk depending on selected farm-specific factors and observed relationships between the different types of milking systems and dPAB contamination levels in raw milk. When dPAB were quantified by cultivation on YELA, strong overgrowth of commensal microbiota impeded counting. Therefore, we conclude that quantification on LGA or by qPCR is preferable. Both methods, colony counting on LGA as well as quantification of dPAB using qPCR, have advantages for the application in (routine) quality control of raw milk, one being low-tech and inexpensive, the other being fast and highly specific, but the detection of (low level) dPAB contamination in raw milk remains a challenge.
Funder
Austrian Competence Centre for Feed and Food Quality, Safety and Innovation
COMET—Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies
Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG
Reference50 articles.
1. The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria, and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov;Scholz;Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.,2016
2. Fuquay, J.W. (2011). Cheese|Raw Milk Cheeses. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
3. A field study investigating the effectiveness of vat milk controls by qPCR for the prevention of undesired propionic acid fermentation in Sbrinz PDO cheese;Turgay;Int. Dairy J.,2018
4. Bücher, C., Burtscher, J., Rudavsky, T., Zitz, U., and Domig, K.J. (J. Dairy Sci., 2024). Sources of Propionic Acid Bacteria Contamination in the Milking Parlor Environment on Alpine Dairy Farms, J. Dairy Sci., accepted.
5. McSweeney, P.L.H., and McNamara, J.P. (2022). Bacteria, Beneficial: Propionibacterium spp. and Acidipropionibacterium spp.. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].