Assessing the Reach and Engagement Effectiveness of Disseminating Food and Nutrition Information on Social Media Channels

Author:

Avelino Daniela C.1ORCID,Lin Carolyn A.2ORCID,Waring Molly E.1ORCID,Barbosa Anna J.1,Duffy Valerie B.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA

2. Department of Communication, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA

Abstract

This study utilized Facebook and Instagram as communication channels for disseminating evidence-based food and nutrition information to low-income adults. From February 2021 to October 2022, 442 identical posts were shared across both platforms for audience reach and engagement. Posts were categorized in two ways: hedonic and three levels of utilitarian (informative, convenience, utility), based on widely applied social media uses and effects theory (Uses and Gratifications Perspective); and food/nutrition topics (dietary guidance, mealtime behaviors, recipes, food resource management, health behaviors, and community building). From predominantly image-based posts (82.6%), reach and engagement for Instagram (136,621 versus 6096, respectively) outperformed Facebook (83,275 versus 1276, respectively). Analysis of covariance of rank-order reach and engagement metrics (likes, replies, shares) showed Facebook engagement was consistent across hedonic and utilitarian categories while Instagram showed highest reach and engagement for utilitarian posts, especially those emphasizing food affordability. Facebook and Instagram differed in which food/nutrition topics achieved maximal reach and engagement. Fifteen posts were randomly selected for qualitative analysis to identify features reflecting engagement levels. Low-engagement posts featured low-color-contrast or less-appealing images, especially on Instagram. This study offers insights for practitioners and researchers aiming to use social media to promote healthy food and nutrition.

Funder

Connecticut Department of Social Services

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. Misinformation and Disinformation in Food Science and Nutrition: Impact on Practice;Diekman;J. Nutr.,2023

2. USDA Food and Nutrition Service (2024, March 07). HEI Scores for Americans, Available online: https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/healthy-eating-index-hei.

3. Healthy Eating Index-2020: Review and Update Process to Reflect the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025;Pannucci;J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.,2023

4. USDA & DHHS (2024, August 04). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, Available online: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans_2020-2025.pdf.

5. Barriers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Addressing Disparities in Diet-Related Cardiovascular Disease in the United States;Petersen;J. Am. Heart Assoc.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3