Essential Oils of Laurus nobilis L.: From Chemical Analysis to In Silico Investigation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity by Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase (sEH) Inhibition
Author:
Fantasma Francesca1, Samukha Vadym1ORCID, Aliberti Michela2, Colarusso Ester2ORCID, Chini Maria Giovanna1, Saviano Gabriella1ORCID, De Felice Vincenzo1ORCID, Lauro Gianluigi2ORCID, Casapullo Agostino2ORCID, Bifulco Giuseppe2, Iorizzi Maria1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, Contrada Fonte Lappone, 86090 Pesche, IS, Italy 2. Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
Abstract
Laurus nobilis L. is commonly used in folk medicine in the form of infusion or decoction to treat gastrointestinal diseases and flatulence as a carminative, antiseptic, and anti-inflammatory agent. In this study, the essential oil (EO) composition of wild-grown L. nobilis L. leaves collected from seven different altitudinal locations in the Molise region and adjacent regions (Abruzzo and Campania) was investigated. EOs from the leaves were obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC-FID and GC/MS, and 78 compounds were identified. The major oil components were 1,8-cineol (43.52–31.31%), methyl-eugenol (14.96–4.07%), α-terpinyl acetate (13.00–8.51%), linalool (11.72–1.08%), sabinene (10.57–4.85%), α-pinene (7.41–3.61%), eugenol (4.12–1.97%), and terpinen-4-ol (2.33–1.25%). Chemometric techniques have been applied to compare the chemical composition. To shed light on the nutraceutical properties of the main hydrophobic secondary metabolites (≥1.0%) of laurel EOs, we assessed the in vitro antioxidant activities based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) radical scavenging activity and the reducing antioxidant power by using a ferric reducing power (FRAP) assay. Furthermore, we highlighted the anti-inflammatory effects of seven EOs able to interfere with the enzyme soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), a key enzyme in the arachidonic acid cascade, in concentrations ranging from 16.5 ± 4.3 to 8062.3 ± 580.9 mg/mL. Thanks to in silico studies, we investigated and rationalized the observed anti-inflammatory properties, ascribing the inhibitory activity toward the disclosed target to the most abundant volatile phytochemicals (≥1.0%) of seven EOs.
Funder
Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (MUR) University of Molise
Reference106 articles.
1. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked?;Reuter;Free Radic. Biol. Med.,2010 2. Vona, R., Pallotta, L., Cappelletti, M., Severi, C., and Matarrese, P. (2021). The impact of oxidative stress in human pathology: Focus on gastrointestinal disorders. Antioxidants, 10. 3. Dziubla, T., and Butterfield, D.A. (2016). Chapter Two—Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Disease. Oxidative Stress and Biomaterials, Academic Press. 4. Pahwa, R., Goyal, A., and Jialal, I. (2023). Chronic Inflammation, StatPearls Publishing. 5. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span;Furman;Nat. Med.,2019
|
|