Consumer Response to Novel Foods: A Review of Behavioral Barriers and Drivers
Author:
Günden Cihat1ORCID, Atakan Pelin2, Yercan Murat1, Mattas Konstadinos3ORCID, Knez Marija45ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Ege University, 35040 İzmir, Turkey 2. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Yaşar University, 35100 İzmir, Turkey 3. Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 4. Capacity Development Network in Nutrition in Central and Eastern Europe (CAPNUTRA), 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5. Centre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
There is a pressing need for a transition toward more sustainable diets, which has become a shared priority for both consumers and businesses. Innovation is becoming increasingly widespread across all facets of the food supply chain. This innovation spans various domains related to production, including sustainable cultivation methods as well as new food technologies like gene editing, new product development like functional foods, and revitalizing underutilized and genetically diverse varieties to preserve biodiversity. However, not all innovative efforts are accepted by consumers and survive in markets. The interwoven and long agri-food supply chains often obscure the feedback loop between production and consumption. Consequently, it is important to understand to what extent consumers embrace these food innovations and form new eating habits. This review aims to investigate the consumer response to novel foods, focusing on behavioral factors, which have yet to receive as much attention as sensory factors. Peer-reviewed empirical articles from the last decade are examined inductively to develop a bird’s-eye view of the behavioral barriers to and drivers of consumer acceptance of novel foods. In addition, strategies to overcome the identified challenges associated with the behavioral barriers are reviewed and examined. Based on this, the study links cognitive biases with behavioral factors influencing consumer acceptance of novel foods. This study concludes that the inconvenience associated with abandoning established eating habits is typically perceived as a loss, and avoiding this inconvenience is deemed more worth the risk than the potential gains associated with novel food consumption. This study suggests that framing and placing pro-diversity labels could serve as effective behavioral interventions for marketing strategists and food policymakers.
Funder
European Commission
Reference134 articles.
1. Biodiversity loss is a development issue A rapid review of evidence Issue Paper;Roe;Lancet Planet. Health,2019 2. FAO (2019). The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, FAO. 3. van der Sluis, M., Anten, N., van Asselt, E., Bonekamp, G., van Hintum, T., Michels, R., Navarro, M., Nel, J., Polman, N., and Hiemstra, S.J. (Wageningen Livestock Research, 2022). The Need to Enhance Crop, Livestock and Aquatic Genetic Diversity in Food Systems, Wageningen Livestock Research, (No. 1385). 4. Belgacem, W., Mattas, K., Arampatzis, G., and Baourakis, G. (2021). Changing dietary behavior for better biodiversity preservation: A preliminary study. Nutrients, 13. 5. Burlingame, B., and Dernini, S. (2012). Sustainable diets and biodiversity: The challenge for policy, evidence and behaviour change. Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity: Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research and Action, FAO.
|
|