Abstract
Car use in modern cities with a well-developed public transit is more sophisticated to explain only through hard factors such as sociodemographic characteristics. In cities, it is especially important to consider motives for car use. Therefore, we examined two modern cities with a high modal share of non-motorized modes and public transit to answer the question: How do the affective and instrumental motives influence car use in such cities? The used data set was collected in Berlin and San Francisco. To investigate the role of motives, we applied an ordered hybrid choice model (OHCM) with a probit kernel. Based on the OHCM we explained more than 14% of the overall heterogeneity and gave further insights to the decision-making process. The affective motive had a strong influence on car use frequency, whereby the instrumental aspects did not matter. Furthermore, an effect resulting from age could not be determined for the affective motives in these cities. Results suggest people are more likely to use cars for affective motives despite the city’s adversities. For these people it is difficult to achieve a shift to alternative means of transport. The only way to intervene here is through regulatory intervention.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference46 articles.
1. Deutsches Mobilitätspanel (MOP)—Wissenschaftliche Begleitung und Auswertungen Bericht 2017/2018: Alltagsmobilität und Fahrleistung;Ecke,2019
2. Mobilität in Deutschland—Ergebnisberichthttp://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD2017_Ergebnisbericht.pdf
3. Soziologie der Verkehrsmittelwahl: Motive und Bedürfnisse im Zusammenhang mit der Verkehrsmittelwahl;Alteneder;Z. Verk.,1995
4. Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car
5. Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献