Enhancing the Accessibility of Pedestrian Environments: Critical Reflections on the Role of the Public Sector Equality Duty

Author:

Lawson Anna1ORCID,Orchard Maria1ORCID,Eskyte Ieva1,Campbell Morgan1

Affiliation:

1. School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Abstract

The British Equality Act 2010’s Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) aims to mainstream equality into the decision-making of public authorities. Although it has generated substantial critique, it has been the subject of surprisingly few empirical investigations, and existing literature does not address the role of the PSED in enhancing accessibility—either in the specific context of streetscapes or more generally. Here, we present the findings of a doctrinal and qualitative study on this topic. It consists of a critical review of relevant case law and an empirical study in which we interviewed disability campaigners, lawyers, and people working in or for public authorities. Two broad issues emerged from the empirical investigation: involvement and enforcement—on each of which our interviewees identified a range of concerns. These, together with our critique of case law, inform our analysis of the impact and effectiveness of the PSED in the context of streetscape accessibility, and accessibility more broadly. We conclude that, while the PSED (together with other Equality Act duties) is charged with a critical role in embedding equality—and, therefore, accessibility—in public authority decision-making, various factors have severely hampered its ability to deliver. Accessibility too often appears to be subordinated to other policy agendas instead of being embedded within them. There is an urgent need for reform to ensure that accessibility is suitably prioritised—both generally and in the particular context of streetscapes.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. Abrams, Dominic, Swift, Hannah J., and Mahmood, L. (2016). Involvement and the Public Sector Equality Duty: A Guide for Public Authorities in Scotland, Equality and Human Rights Commission.

2. A Ladder of Citizen Participation;Arnstein;Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969

3. Bogg, Alan, Costello, Cathryn, Davies, ACL, and Adams-Prassl, Jeremias (2015). Evaluating the Reflexive Turn in Labour Law. The Autonomy of Labour Law, Hart Publishing.

4. The Regulatory Space of Equality and Human Rights in Britain: The Role of the Equality and Human Rights Commission;Barrett;Legal Studies,2019

5. Barrett, David (2023). Implementation Behaviours and a Strength- Based Approach to Equality and Human Rights Implementation. Industrial Law Journal, dwad020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3