Affiliation:
1. Institute of Informatics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 07 Bratislava, Slovakia
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-8639, Iran
3. School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, D02 YY50 Dublin, Ireland
Abstract
The automotive family design is known as one of the most complex engineering design problems with multiple groups of stakeholders involved from different domains of interest and contradictory attributes. Taking into account all stakeholders’ preferences, which are generally symmetrical, non-deterministic distributions around a mean value, and determining the right value of attributes for each alternative are two basic challenges for these types of decision-making problems. In this research, the possibility to achieve a robust-reliable decision by focusing on the two aforementioned challenges is explored. In the proposed methodology, a random simulation technique is used to elicit stakeholders’ preferences and determine the relative importance of attributes. The decision space and values of attributes are determined using the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) technique, and to achieve a robust-reliable decision, statistical and sensitivity analyses are performed. By implementing this methodology, the decision-maker is assured that the preferences of all stakeholders are taken into account and the determined values for attributes are reliable with the least degree of uncertainty. The proposed methodology aims to select benchmark platforms for the development of an automotive family. The decision space includes 546 automobiles in 11 different segments based on 34 platforms. There are 6223 unique possible states of stakeholders’ preferences. As a result, five platforms with the highest degree of desirability and robustness to diversity and uncertainty in the stakeholders’ preferences are selected. The presented methodology can be implemented in complex decision-making problems, including a large and diverse number of stakeholders and multiple attributes. In addition, this methodology is compatible with many Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) techniques, including SAW, AHP, SWARA, and TOPSIS.
Funder
The Slovak Scientific Grand Agency VEGA
Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Research Training in Artificial Intelligence
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),General Mathematics,Chemistry (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference88 articles.
1. Saghari, A., Hosseinimehr, M., Rahmani, S., and Budinská, I. (2022, January 15–17). Human Judgment Simulation and KDD Techniques in Automotive Platform Benchmark Selection. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 20th Jubilee International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), Subotica, Serbia.
2. Xu, Z. (2015). Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer.
3. Vinogradova, I. (2019). Multi-attribute decision-making methods as a part of mathematical optimization. Mathematics, 7.
4. Azar, F.S. (2000). Multiattribute Decision-Making: Use of Three Scoring Methods to Compare the Performance of Imaging Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection, Department of Computer & Information Science, University of Pennsylvania. Technical Reports (CIS).
5. A hybrid algorithm for portfolio selection: An application on the Dow Jones Index (DJI);J. Comput. Appl. Math.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献