Affiliation:
1. College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
2. Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
3. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
Abstract
The knowledge that precision weed control in agricultural fields can reduce waste and increase productivity has led to research into autonomous machines capable of detecting and removing weeds in real time. One of the driving factors for weed detection is to develop alternatives to herbicides, which are becoming less effective as weed species develop resistance. Advances in deep learning technology have significantly improved the robustness of weed detection tasks. However, deep learning algorithms often require extensive computational resources, typically found in powerful computers that are not suitable for deployment in robotic platforms. Most ground rovers and UAVs utilize embedded computers that are portable but limited in performance. This necessitates research into deep learning models that are computationally lightweight enough to function in embedded computers for real-time applications while still maintaining a base level of detection accuracy. This paper evaluates the weed detection performance of three real-time-capable deep learning models, YOLOv4, EfficientDet, and CenterNet, when run on a deep-learning-enabled embedded computer, an Nvidia Jetson Xavier AGX. We tested the accuracy of the models in detecting 13 different species of weeds and assesses their real-time viability through their inference speeds on an embedded computer compared to a powerful deep learning PC. The results showed that YOLOv4 performed better than the other models, achieving an average inference speed of 80 ms per image and 14 frames per second on a video when run on an imbedded computer, while maintaining a mean average precision of 93.4% at a 50% IoU threshold. Furthermore, recognizing that some real-world applications may require even greater speed, and that the detection program would not be the only task running on the embedded computer, a lightweight version of the YOLOv4 model, YOLOv4-tiny, was tested for improved performance in an embedded computer. YOLOv4-tiny impressively achieved an average inference speed of 24.5 ms per image and 52 frames per second, albeit with a slightly reduced mean average precision of 89% at a 50% IoU threshold, making it an ideal choice for real-time weed detection.
Funder
US Cotton Incorporated
US Georgia Peanut Commission
Reference43 articles.
1. Crop Losses to Pests;Oerke;J. Agric. Sci.,2006
2. The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production;Gianessi;Weed Technol.,2007
3. Theoretical and Practical Challenges to an IPM Approach to Weed Management;Buhler;Weed Sci.,2000
4. Rueda-Ayala, V., Rasmussen, J., and Gerhards, R. (2010). Precision Crop Protection—the Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity, Springer.
5. A History of Weed Control in the United States and Canada;Timmons;Weed Sci.,1970
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献