Comparing Classical and Quantum Generative Learning Models for High-Fidelity Image Synthesis

Author:

Jain Siddhant1,Geraci Joseph2345,Ruda Harry E.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Engineering Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

2. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

3. Quantum Computation and Neuroscience, Arthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

4. Center for Biotechnology and Genomics Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA

5. NetraMark Holdings, Toronto, ON M6P 3T1, Canada

6. Centre for Nanotechnology, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

Abstract

The field of computer vision has long grappled with the challenging task of image synthesis, which entails the creation of novel high-fidelity images. This task is underscored by the Generative Learning Trilemma, which posits that it is not possible for any image synthesis model to simultaneously excel at high-quality sampling, achieve mode convergence with diverse sample representation, and perform rapid sampling. In this paper, we explore the potential of Quantum Boltzmann Machines (QBMs) for image synthesis, leveraging the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer. We undertake a comprehensive performance assessment of QBMs in comparison to established generative models in the field: Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs). Our evaluation is grounded in widely recognized scoring metrics, including the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), Kernel Inception Distance (KID), and Inception Scores. The results of our study indicate that QBMs do not significantly outperform the conventional models in terms of the three evaluative criteria. Moreover, QBMs have not demonstrated the capability to overcome the challenges outlined in the Trilemma of Generative Learning. Through our investigation, we contribute to the understanding of quantum computing’s role in generative learning and identify critical areas for future research to enhance the capabilities of image synthesis models.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference34 articles.

1. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models;Larochelle;Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2020

2. Dhariwal, P., and Nichol, A. (2021). Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis. arXiv.

3. Quantum and classical machine learning for the classification of non-small-cell lung cancer patients;Jain;SN Appl. Sci.,2020

4. Thulasidasan, S. (2016). Generative Modeling for Machine Learning on the D-Wave, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL). Technical Report.

5. Quantum Boltzmann Machine;Amin;Phys. Rev. X,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3