Influence of Random Modulated Power Converter on G3 Power Line Communication

Abstract

Power Line Communication (PLC) technologies are being used in many applications and offer the advantage of utilizing existing power cables for both power and data transmission, thus minimizing cost and complexity. Nevertheless, PLC technology requires further investigation to solve possible co-existence issues. Indeed, recent studies confirmed that alternative modulation schemes such as Random Pulse Width Modulation (RPWM), applied to switching-mode power converters to minimize conducted emissions, detrimentally interfere with the PLC system. This paper presents an experimental test campaign aimed at investigating the effects of RPWM on the G3-PLC system, with the final goal of understanding the conditions under which RPWM schemes can be considered as an effective alternative to conventional Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) in applications involving PLC systems. In details, the effects of different RPWM parameters such as switching frequency, modulation index, and Random Number Update Rate (RNUR) on the G3-PLC is investigated. In addition, different RPWM schemes such as Random Frequency Modulation (RFM) and Random Pulse Position Modulation (RPPM) are compared in terms of performance so as to highlight which RPWM is best suited to assure coexistence with PLC systems. The impact of RPWM on the communication channel is evaluated in terms of Frame Error Rate (FER), Channel Capacity, and Channel Capacity Loss metrics. Experimental results confirmed that randomly modulated converters with switching frequencies near the G3-PLC bandwidth cause more significant disturbance and possible coexistence issues than the switching frequencies out of this range. Results also show that the modulation index and the RNUR of RPWM have a direct effect on the communication channel. Moreover, a trade-off between Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) reduction and coexistence issues is observed: RFM, which is very effective for EMI reduction, is found to be very disruptive for G3-PLC, compared to alternative random modulation techniques such as RPPM.