Abstract
This study explores how audiences responded to perceiving and distinguishing the paintings created by AI or human artists. The stimuli were six paintings which were completed by AI and human artists. A total of 750 subjects participated to identify which ones were completed by human artists or by AI. Results revealed that most participants could correctly distinguish between paintings made by AI or human artists and that accuracy was higher for those who used “intuition” as the criterion for judgment. The participants preferred the paintings created by human artists. Furthermore, there were big differences in the perception of the denotation and connotation of paintings between audiences of different backgrounds. The reasons for this will be analyzed in subsequent research.
Funder
Nanjing Forestry University
National Science Council
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference28 articles.
1. After Selling an AI Portrait for More than $430,000, the Obvious Collective Has a New Trick: Mashing up Cave Art and Graffitihttps://news.artnet.com/art-world/obvious-cave-art-graffiti-mashup-1928105
2. Artistic Reflection on Artificial Intelligence Digital Painting
3. AI Painting
4. Could a Computer Ever Create Better Art than a Human?https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47700701
5. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology;Kurzweil,2005
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献