Endometriosis Predictive Models Based on Self-Assessment Questionnaire, Evidence from Clinical Examination or Imaging Findings: A Narrative Review

Author:

Gkrozou Fani1ORCID,Tsonis Orestis23ORCID,Sorrentino Felice4ORCID,Nappi Luigi4,Vatopoulou Anastasia1,Skentou Chara1,Pandey Suruchi3,Paschopoulos Minas1,Daniilidis Angelos5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece

2. Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK

3. Department of Gynaecology, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1E 6BT, UK

4. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy

5. 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate existing questionnaires on predictive models for endometriosis. These symptom-based models have the potential to serve as screening tools for adult women to detect endometriosis. Data sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies on endometriosis screening. Selection of studies: The search targeted predictive models for endometriosis localisation, bowel involvement, need for bowel surgery and fertility. Due to the heterogeneity identified, a systematic review was not possible. A total of 23 studies were identified. Data extraction and synthesis: Among these studies, twelve included measures for general endometriosis, two targeted specific sites, four focused on deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and three addressed the need for endometriosis-related bowel surgery. Many measures combined clinical, imaging and laboratory tests with patient questionnaires. Validation of these models as screening tools was lacking in all studies, as the focus was on diagnosis rather than screening. Conclusion: This review did not identify any fully validated, symptom-based questionnaires for endometriosis screening in adult women. Substantial validation work remains to establish the efficacy of such tools.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3