Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure (E-VAC) in Septic Shock from Perforated Duodenal Ulcers with Abscess Formations

Author:

Ciuntu Bogdan Mihnea12,Tanevski Adelina12,Buescu David Ovidiu12,Lutenco Valerii34,Mihailov Raul34ORCID,Ciuntu Madalina Stefana5,Zuzu Mihai Marius12,Vintila Dan12,Zabara Mihai12,Trofin Ana12,Cadar Ramona12,Nastase Alexandru12,Lupascu Ursulescu Corina6,Lupascu Cristian Dumitru12

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania

2. General Surgery Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 1 Independence Boulevard, 700111 Iasi, Romania

3. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 800010 Galati, Romania

4. General Surgery Clinic, “St. Apostol Andrei” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Strada Brăilei 177, 800578 Galati, Romania

5. Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania

6. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania

Abstract

This case report underscores the importance of utilizing E-VAC (endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure) in the treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer complicated by the formation of a subphrenic abscess and septic shock. It showcases how E-VAC can effectively mitigate the risk of further complications, such as leakage, bleeding, or rupture, which are more commonly associated with traditional methods like stents, clips, or sutures. As a result, there is a significant reduction in mortality rates. A perforated duodenal ulcer accompanied by abscess formation represents a critical medical condition that demands prompt surgical intervention. The choice of the method for abscess drainage and perforation closure plays a pivotal role in determining the patient’s chances of survival. Notably, in patients with a high ASA (American Association of Anesthesiologists) score of IV-V, the mortality rate following conventional surgical intervention is considerably elevated. The management of perforated duodenal ulcers has evolved from open abdominal surgical procedures, which were associated with high mortality rates and risk of suture repair leakage, to minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopy and ingestible robots. Previously, complications arising from peptic ulcers, such as perforations, leaks, and fistulas, were primarily addressed through surgical and conservative treatments. However, over the past two decades, the medical community has shifted towards employing endoscopic closure techniques, including stents, clips, and E-VAC. E-VAC, in particular, has shown promising outcomes by promoting rapid and consistent healing. This case report presents the clinical scenario of a patient diagnosed with septic shock due to a perforated duodenal ulcer with abscess formation. Following an exploratory laparotomy that confirmed the presence of a subphrenic abscess, three drainage tubes were utilized to evacuate it. Subsequently, E-VAC therapy was initiated, with the kit being replaced three times during the recovery period. The patient exhibited favorable progress, including weight gain, and was ultimately discharged as fully recovered. In the treatment of patients with duodenal perforated ulcers and associated abscess formation, the successful and comprehensive drainage of the abscess, coupled with the closure of the perforation, emerges as a pivotal factor influencing the patient’s healing process. The positive outcomes observed in these patients underscore the efficacy of employing a negative pressure E-VAC kit, resulting in thorough drainage, rapid patient recovery, and low mortality rates.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation;Weledji;Front. Surg.,2020

2. Retrospective analysis of different therapeutic approaches for retroperitoneal duodenal perforations;Yurttas;Sci. Rep.,2022

3. (2023, December 15). Statement on ASA Physical Status Classification System. Available online: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/statement-on-asa-physical-status-classification-system.

4. Epidemiology of perforating peptic ulcer: A population-based retrospective study over 40 years;Dadfar;World J. Gastroenterol.,2020

5. Peptic ulcer disease complicated with choledocho-duodenal fistula and gastro-intestinal bleeding: A case report and review of the literature;Uhe;Front. Surg.,2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New Horizons of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Surgery;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-04-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3