Comparison of Combined Parenteral and Oral Hormonal Contraceptives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Author:

Vleskó Gábor12,Meznerics Fanni Adél23,Hegyi Péter245,Teutsch Brigitta24,Unicsovics Márkó12,Sipos Zoltán46,Fehérvári Péter27,Ács Nándor12,Várbíró Szabolcs18,Keszthelyi Márton12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, 1082 Budapest, Hungary

2. Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary

3. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1082 Budapest, Hungary

4. Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary

5. Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary

6. Institute of Bioanalysis, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary

7. Department of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary

8. Workgroup of Research Management, Doctoral School, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Background: Delivering contraceptive hormones through a transdermal patch or a vaginal ring might have advantages over the traditional oral route. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness, compliance, and side effect profile of oral and parenteral drug administration methods. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in four medical databases—MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Embase, and Scopus—from inception to 20 November 2022. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy, compliance, and adverse event profile of combined parenteral and oral hormonal contraceptives were included. Results: Our systematic search provided 3952 records; after duplicate removal, we screened 2707 duplicate-free records. A total of 13 eligible studies were identified after title, abstract, and full-text selection. We observed no significant difference in contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) between oral and parenteral drug administration (MD = −0.06, CI: −0.66–0.53; I2 = 0%). We found significant subgroup differences between parenteral methods in terms of compliance (χ2 = 4.32, p =0.038, I2 = 80%) and certain adverse events: breast discomfort (χ2 = 19.04, p =0.001, I2 = 80%), nausea (χ2 = 8.04, p =0.005, I2 = 75%), and vomiting (χ2 = 9.30, p =0.002; I2 = 72%). Conclusion: Both parenteral and oral contraceptives can be used as an effective contraceptive method, and the route of administration should be tailored to patient needs and adverse event occurrence.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

1. Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review;Teal;JAMA,2021

2. Contraceptive discontinuation: Frequency and associated factors among undergraduate women in Brazil;Moreau;Reprod. Health,2019

3. Forgettable contraception;Grimes;Contraception,2009

4. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception;Halpern;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2013

5. The vaginal ring and transdermal patch: New methods of contraception;McNamee;Sex Health,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3