Evaluating the Readiness of Ships and Ports to Bunker and Use Alternative Fuels: A Case Study from Brazil
-
Published:2023-09-24
Issue:10
Volume:11
Page:1856
-
ISSN:2077-1312
-
Container-title:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMSE
Author:
Wei Huang1, Müller-Casseres Eduardo1ORCID, Belchior Carlos R. P.2, Szklo Alexandre1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (CENERGIA), Centro de Tecnologia, Sala C-211, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, RJ, Brazil 2. Ocean Engineering Program—COPPE/UFRJ, Centro de Tecnologia, Sala C-203, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21945-970, RJ, Brazil
Abstract
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has recently revised its strategy for shipping decarbonization, deepening the ambition to reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The accomplishment of this strategy requires the large-scale deployment of alternative maritime fuels, whose diversity and technical characteristics impose transition challenges. While several studies address the production of these fuels, a notable gap lies in the analysis of the required adaptations in vessels and ports for their usage. This study aims to fill this gap with a comprehensive review of material compatibility, storage in ports/vessels, and bunkering technology. First, we analyze key aspects of port/vessel adaptation: physical and chemical properties; energy conversion for propulsion; fuel feeding and storage; and bunkering procedures. Then, we perform a maturity assessment, placing each studied fuel on the technological readiness scale, revealing the most promising options regarding infrastructure adaptability. Finally, we develop a case study from Brazil, whose economy is grounded on maritime exports. The findings indicate that multi-product ports may have the potential to serve as multi-fuel hubs, while the remaining ports are inclined to specific fuels. In terms of vessel categories, we find that oil tankers, chemical ships, and gas carriers are most ready for conversion in the short term.
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference146 articles.
1. Longarela-Ares, Á., Calvo-Silvosa, A., and Pérez-López, J.B. (2020). The Influence of Economic Barriers and Drivers on Energy Efficiency Investments in Maritime Shipping, from the Perspective of the Principal-Agent Problem. Sustainability, 12. 2. United Nations (2017). The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment, Cambridge University Press. 3. Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Zhang, S., Pereda, P., Comer, B., Hauerhof, E., van der Loeff, W.S., Smith, T., Zhang, Y., and Kosaka, H. (2020). Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020, IMO. 4. Smith, T.W.P., Jalkanen, J.P., Anderson, B.A., Corbett, J.J., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., O’Keeffe, E., Parker, S., Johansson, L., and Aldous, L. (2014). Third IMO GHG Study 2014, IMO. 5. Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures According to Their Marginal Abatement Costs and Their Mitigation Potentials;Szklo;Energy Policy,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|