Discomfort in Use and Physical Disturbance of FFP2 Masks in a Group of Italian Doctors, Nurses and Nursing Aides during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Discomfort in Use and Physical Disturbance of FFP2 Masks in a Group of Italian Doctors, Nurses and Nursing Aides during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published:2023-06-13 Issue:2 Volume:9 Page:40
ISSN:2313-576X
Container-title:Safety
language:en
Short-container-title:Safety

Author:

Micheletti Cremasco Margherita¹^ORCID,Vigoroso Lucia²³^ORCID,Solinas Cristina⁴,Caffaro Federica²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Turin, Italy

2. Department of Education, Roma Tre University, Via del Castro Pretorio 20, 00185 Rome, Italy

3. Institute of Sciences and Technologies for Sustainable Energy and Mobility (STEMS), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Turin, Italy

4. Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Via Verdi 10, 10124 Turin, Italy

Abstract

Face masks represent an effective COVID-19 mitigation strategy; this study investigated the quality in use of FFP2 masks in a group of 156 frontline HCWs recruited through a snowball procedure in northwest Italy. Participants filled out an online questionnaire (January 2022) on FFP2 sources of discomfort, physical disturbance at different anatomical points and suggestions for improvement. Most of the participants (69%) reported a feeling of protection and safety, but they also reported episodes of dyspnea (70%). The majority of glasses wearers (62%) reported fogging and displacement of their glasses. Humidity and heat were the main discomfort sources (39%), followed by elastic bands (32%). Physical disturbances were frequent and heavier on the ears, nose and cheekbones. Nursing aides and nurses perceived significantly more discomfort compared to doctors and nursing aides had the highest rate of physical disturbance. To address these issues, following participants’ suggestions, FFP2 masks should be redesigned to be more adjustable, with different sizes and softer fabrics. The investigation pointed out criticalities in the use of FFP2 masks related to different professional roles within the overall group of HCWs and stressed the need for an FFP2 human-centered design that accounts not only for physical needs but also for workload and task variability.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/9/2/40/pdf

Reference72 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2023, March 14). Statement on the Second Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov).

2. World Health Organization (2023, March 14). WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-COVID-19—11-march-2020.

3. World Health Organization (2020). Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), International Labour Organization. Interim Guidance.

4. Mascherine Chirurgiche vs. Respiratori: Proprietà e Indicazioni;Checchi;Dent. Cadmos,2020

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023, March 14). Understanding the Difference. Surgical N95 vs. Standard N95—Which to Consider?. Available online: https://aaasolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Mask-Compair-CDC-Compair-3M-N95-Surgical-vrs-Standard.pdf.