Tertiary Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Where Do We Stand?

Author:

van Mourik Frank1,Jutte Annemarie12ORCID,Berendse Stijn E.1,Bukhsh Faiza A.1ORCID,Ahmed Faizan12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands

2. Ambient Intelligence Research Group, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, 7513 AB Enschede, The Netherlands

Abstract

Research into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods has exploded over the past five years. It is essential to synthesize and categorize this research and, for this purpose, multiple systematic reviews on XAI mapped out the landscape of the existing methods. To understand how these methods have developed and been applied and what evidence has been accumulated through model training and analysis, we carried out a tertiary literature review that takes as input systematic literature reviews published between 1992 and 2023. We evaluated 40 systematic literature review papers and presented binary tabular overviews of researched XAI methods and their respective characteristics, such as the scope, scale, input data, explanation data, and machine learning models researched. We identified seven distinct characteristics and organized them into twelve specific categories, culminating in the creation of comprehensive research grids. Within these research grids, we systematically documented the presence or absence of research mentions for each pairing of characteristic and category. We identified 14 combinations that are open to research. Our findings reveal a significant gap, particularly in categories like the cross-section of feature graphs and numerical data, which appear to be notably absent or insufficiently addressed in the existing body of research and thus represent a future research road map.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference108 articles.

1. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences;Miller;Artif. Intell.,2019

2. Algorithmic Fairness in Mortgage Lending: From Absolute Conditions to Relational Trade-offs;Lee;Minds Mach.,2021

3. Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D., Madai, V.I., and consortium, t.P. (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 20.

4. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations;Zhang;Nat. Med.,2021

5. European Commission (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. EUR-Lex, COM(2021) 206 final, Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3