Optical Methods for Brain Tumor Detection: A Systematic Review

Author:

Burström Gustav1,Amini Misha1,El-Hajj Victor Gabriel1ORCID,Arfan Arooj1,Gharios Maria1ORCID,Buwaider Ali1ORCID,Losch Merle S.2ORCID,Manni Francesca3ORCID,Edström Erik145ORCID,Elmi-Terander Adrian1456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

2. Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2627 Delft, The Netherlands

3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), 5612 Eindhoven, The Netherlands

4. Capio Spine Center Stockholm, Löwenströmska Hospital, 194 80 Upplands-Väsby, Sweden

5. Department of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden

6. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 35 Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Background: In brain tumor surgery, maximal tumor resection is typically desired. This is complicated by infiltrative tumor cells which cannot be visually distinguished from healthy brain tissue. Optical methods are an emerging field that can potentially revolutionize brain tumor surgery through intraoperative differentiation between healthy and tumor tissues. Methods: This study aimed to systematically explore and summarize the existing literature on the use of Raman Spectroscopy (RS), Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), and Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS) for brain tumor detection. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating the accuracy of these systems for brain tumor detection. Outcome measures included accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: In total, 44 studies were included, covering a range of tumor types and technologies. Accuracy metrics in the studies ranged between 54 and 100% for RS, 69 and 99% for HSI, 82 and 99% for OCT, and 42 and 100% for DRS. Conclusions: This review provides insightful evidence on the use of optical methods in distinguishing tumor from healthy brain tissue.

Funder

Region Stockholm

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3